2017
DOI: 10.1111/syen.12244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultraconserved elements show utility in phylogenetic inference of Adephaga (Coleoptera) and suggest paraphyly of ‘Hydradephaga’

Abstract: The beetle suborder Adephaga has been the subject of many phylogenetic reconstructions utilizing a variety of data sources and inference methods. However, no strong consensus has yet emerged on the relationships among major adephagan lineages. Ultraconserved elements (UCEs) have proved useful for inferring difficult or unresolved phylogenies at varying timescales in vertebrates, arachnids and Hymenoptera. Recently, a UCE bait set was developed for Coleoptera using polyphagan genomes and a member of the order S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
146
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
146
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The systematic position of the family within the suborder Adephaga is not fully settled (e.g., McKenna et al., ). However, a sister group relationship with all other adephagan families appears most likely, supported by morphological characters (Beutel & Roughley, ; Beutel et al., ) and also by a recent molecular study (Baca, Alana, Gustafson, & Short, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The systematic position of the family within the suborder Adephaga is not fully settled (e.g., McKenna et al., ). However, a sister group relationship with all other adephagan families appears most likely, supported by morphological characters (Beutel & Roughley, ; Beutel et al., ) and also by a recent molecular study (Baca, Alana, Gustafson, & Short, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The stability of any phylogenetics-based classification relies upon high confidence and support for internal relationships. In other animal groups, genomic- or subgenomic-scale approaches have produced phylogenies with generally higher nodal support and have resolved difficult relationships (e.g., Blaimer et al 2015, Garrison et al 2016, Hamilton et al 2016, Baca et al 2017, Branstetter et al 2017, Breinholt et al 2017, Hedin et al 2018). In this paper we utilize DNA sequences derived from capture of ultraconserved elements (UCEs; Faircloth 2017) to reconstruct phylogenomic relationships within Travunioidea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an expanded dataset (in both taxa and characters) using five genes negated that classification and supplanted it with a new one (Baca et al, 2017a). No molecular data has been applied to the evolution of Haliplidae, and the phylogenetic validity of some smaller genera is uncertain; phylogenies based on morphological data have been inferred for the family (Beutel & Ruhnau, 1990) as well as the genus Brychius (Mousseau & Roughley, 2007).…”
Section: Water Beetle Phylogenymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In group after group, mounting molecular support for nontraditional relationships has required reconsideration of the morphology and classification of families considered stable (e.g. the separation of the terrestrial and aquatic hydrophilids into different subfamilies, or the very derived nature of Pronoterus within Noteridae; Short & Fikáček, 2013;Baca et al, 2017a). Often, discrepancies between morphological and molecular datasets have not been due to a difference in the quality of characters, but instead are due to inaccurate and subjective assessments of homology.…”
Section: Phylogenymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation