2016
DOI: 10.1111/jmi.12378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultra‐thin resin embedding method for scanning electron microscopy of individual cells on high and low aspect ratio 3D nanostructures

Abstract: The preparation of biological cells for either scanning or transmission electron microscopy requires a complex process of fixation, dehydration and drying. Critical point drying is commonly used for samples investigated with a scanning electron beam, whereas resin-infiltration is typically used for transmission electron microscopy. Critical point drying may cause cracks at the cellular surface and a sponge-like morphology of nondistinguishable intracellular compartments. Resin-infiltrated biological samples re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
62
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4). The evaluation of the true interface cleft distance in vivo is a question of current debate, as the fixation of cells for electron microscopy can produce a cleft morphology different from what is present in vivo 15, 54 . The cleft distance has been determined to change as much as 10–50 nm following fixation in some cases, even where cryofixation methods are employed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). The evaluation of the true interface cleft distance in vivo is a question of current debate, as the fixation of cells for electron microscopy can produce a cleft morphology different from what is present in vivo 15, 54 . The cleft distance has been determined to change as much as 10–50 nm following fixation in some cases, even where cryofixation methods are employed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To preserve cells for SEM, they were embedded in epoxy-resin by stepping from pure ethanol to pure resin as described previously. 11 2.5 FIB cuts-The samples were glued to a SEM stub using silver glue (Plano GmbH). To protect the cells from the ion and electron beams the samples were sputtered for 30s at 15mA with platinum (a 1-1.5 µm thick layer).…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, using FIB-SEM to examine the cell-to-materials interface is severely limited by the lack of contrast of biological specimens and the sponge-like intracellular defects induced by hard drying procedures 2224 . Resin embedding preparation with heavy metals allow the visualization of intracellular structures even in proximity of nanostructures 25,26 but the resin matrix around the cells does not allow any visualization of the entire cells unless a 3D reconstruction of the whole specimen is performed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our method, after resin infiltration and before resin polymerization, a resin-removal step is introduced that strips off the excess extracellular resin by first draining and, then, flushing the sample with ethanol. This step thins down the resin coating outside the cell membrane to tens of nanometers while maintaining a stable intracellular resin embedding 24 . The final step involves curing the liquid resin to a thin layer of plastic with cells embedded inside.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%