2008
DOI: 10.2961/jlmn.2008.01.0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultra-Short Pulse Laser Ablation of Biological Hard Tissue and Biocompatibles

Abstract: Direct-writing techniques are adequate tools for rapid prototyping of diverse materials, since they avoid the usage of moulds or masks. Among them, laser-induced forward transfer (LIFT) has become a promising tool for rapid prototyping of microdevices due to the high focusing power of lasers, which provides a high resolution, and also to their non-contact and orifice-free nature, which avoids clogging and thus allows working with a wide range of materials. This makes LIFT an appropriate tool for biosensors pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These lasers, commonly called as USPL (ultra short pulse lasers), operates at very high repetition rate (larger than 15 kHz) and energy per pulse typically of hundreds of µJ (Wieger et al, 2006). Although USPLs have extremely higher repetition rate (> KHz) and peak power (up to TW), previous studies relate that a single ultra short laser pulse removes significantly less volume of dental tissue when compared to conventional Er:YAG laser removal (Strassl et al, 2008). This fact occurs due to the differences in focal size and penetration depth of USPLs (which are severely lower when compared to Er:YAG lasers that operate at pulse width of µs); in this way, the pulse repetition rate had to be increased in USPLs to obtain a similar ablation volume than those obtained by Er:YAG (Wieger et al, 2006).…”
Section: Influence Of Pulse Width On Tissue Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These lasers, commonly called as USPL (ultra short pulse lasers), operates at very high repetition rate (larger than 15 kHz) and energy per pulse typically of hundreds of µJ (Wieger et al, 2006). Although USPLs have extremely higher repetition rate (> KHz) and peak power (up to TW), previous studies relate that a single ultra short laser pulse removes significantly less volume of dental tissue when compared to conventional Er:YAG laser removal (Strassl et al, 2008). This fact occurs due to the differences in focal size and penetration depth of USPLs (which are severely lower when compared to Er:YAG lasers that operate at pulse width of µs); in this way, the pulse repetition rate had to be increased in USPLs to obtain a similar ablation volume than those obtained by Er:YAG (Wieger et al, 2006).…”
Section: Influence Of Pulse Width On Tissue Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another strategy for cooling the tissue during laser irradiation is reducing the pulse duration (Seka et al, 1995). Depending on the pulse duration (<1 ps), the process of ablation is changed and the non-linear processes (or non-thermal ones) take place (Ana et al, 2006;Freitas et al, 2010;Kruger et al, 2008;McDonald et al, 2001;Niemz, 2004;Strassl et al, 2008).…”
Section: Influence Of Pulse Width On Tissue Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations