Abstract:We present results on ultra low noise YBa 2 Cu 3 O 7−δ nano Superconducting QUantum Interference Devices (nanoSQUIDs). To realize such devices, we implemented high quality YBCO nanowires, working as weak links between two electrodes. We observe critical current modulation as a function of an externally applied magnetic field in the full temperature range below the transition temperature T C . The white flux noise below 1 µΦ 0 / √ Hz at T = 8 K makes our nanoSQUIDs very attractive for the detection of small spi… Show more
“…Nanowire networks [12] and loops [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] are qualitatively distinct from conventional Josephson junction and SQUIDS due to the linear nature of the nanowire CPR [13]. In contrast, conventional Josephson junctions obey a sinusoidal CPR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We also observe that the general shape of the I C (B) curve is made of linear segments rather than being sinusoidal. At temperatures much lower than T C , a linear CPR (and therefore a linear relationship between critical current and field) is both expected [2,[26][27][28][29] and has been observed experimentally [13,15,[22][23][24]. Advanced computational simulations based on Ginzburg-Landau theory, which is known to be valid at temperatures near the critical temperature T C [30], have been used to simulate the critical current versus field dependence of nanowire loops previously [22,24,25].…”
We study nanodevices based on ultrathin superconducting nanowires connected in parallel to form nanowire SQUIDs. The function of the critical current versus magnetic field, IC (B), is multivalued, asymmetric and its maxima and minima are shifted from the usual integer and half integer flux quantum points. The nanowire interference device is qualitatively distinct from conventional SQUIDs because nanowires do not obey the same current-phase relationship (CPR) as Josephson junctions. We demonstrate that the results can be explained assuming that (i) the CPR is linear and (ii) that each wire is characterized by a sample-specific critical phase, which is usually much larger than π/2. Our proposed model offers accurate fits to IC (B). It explains the single-valuedness regions where only one vorticity (i.e., the order parameter winding number) is stable as well as regions where multiple vorticity values are allowed for the SQUIDs. We also observe and explain regions in which the standard deviation of the switching current is independent of the magnetic field. We develop a technique that allows a reliable detection of hidden phase-slips. Using this technique we find that our model correctly predicts the boundaries of vorticity regions, even at low currents where IC (B) is not directly measurable.
“…Nanowire networks [12] and loops [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] are qualitatively distinct from conventional Josephson junction and SQUIDS due to the linear nature of the nanowire CPR [13]. In contrast, conventional Josephson junctions obey a sinusoidal CPR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We also observe that the general shape of the I C (B) curve is made of linear segments rather than being sinusoidal. At temperatures much lower than T C , a linear CPR (and therefore a linear relationship between critical current and field) is both expected [2,[26][27][28][29] and has been observed experimentally [13,15,[22][23][24]. Advanced computational simulations based on Ginzburg-Landau theory, which is known to be valid at temperatures near the critical temperature T C [30], have been used to simulate the critical current versus field dependence of nanowire loops previously [22,24,25].…”
We study nanodevices based on ultrathin superconducting nanowires connected in parallel to form nanowire SQUIDs. The function of the critical current versus magnetic field, IC (B), is multivalued, asymmetric and its maxima and minima are shifted from the usual integer and half integer flux quantum points. The nanowire interference device is qualitatively distinct from conventional SQUIDs because nanowires do not obey the same current-phase relationship (CPR) as Josephson junctions. We demonstrate that the results can be explained assuming that (i) the CPR is linear and (ii) that each wire is characterized by a sample-specific critical phase, which is usually much larger than π/2. Our proposed model offers accurate fits to IC (B). It explains the single-valuedness regions where only one vorticity (i.e., the order parameter winding number) is stable as well as regions where multiple vorticity values are allowed for the SQUIDs. We also observe and explain regions in which the standard deviation of the switching current is independent of the magnetic field. We develop a technique that allows a reliable detection of hidden phase-slips. Using this technique we find that our model correctly predicts the boundaries of vorticity regions, even at low currents where IC (B) is not directly measurable.
“…Still, the fabrication of YBCO cJJs with 50 nm × 50 nm cross-section and 100 − 200 nm length has been reported recently 101 . These JJs exhibit large I c of a few mA at 300 mK.…”
Section: Nanosquids Based On Cuprate Superconductorsmentioning
“…From this dependence we extract the critical current modulation depth I C (T ) = I max C (T ) − I min C (T ), which allows one to calculate the screening factor of the SQUID β expt. [29], assuming the Likharev-Yakobson expression for the current phase relation of the nanowire [30][31][32]. Furthermore, the screening factor can be expressed as…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To extract the value of the London penetration depth, following Ref. [29], we have numerically calculated L loop at each temperature by solving the Maxwell and London equations describing the Meissner state on our nanoSQUID geometry, and assuming that the temperature dependence is given by the two-fluid model for the London penetration depth λ L = λ 0…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.