2021
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013498.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Long-acting insulin analogues were specifically developed to lower the risk of hypoglycaemia in patients with diabetes requiring insulin, especially nocturnal hypoglycaemia, as well as improve patient convenience through reducing the number of injections thereby enhancing adherence rates, which is a continuing concern with insulin [7,9,[27][28][29][30]. There is still controversy though regarding the level of benefit seen with long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH and other insulins [31][32][33]. However, a recent systematic review and network meta-analysis suggests that long-acting insulin analogues were superior to intermediate-acting insulins in key areas including major, serious, and nocturnal hypoglycaemia [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-acting insulin analogues were specifically developed to lower the risk of hypoglycaemia in patients with diabetes requiring insulin, especially nocturnal hypoglycaemia, as well as improve patient convenience through reducing the number of injections thereby enhancing adherence rates, which is a continuing concern with insulin [7,9,[27][28][29][30]. There is still controversy though regarding the level of benefit seen with long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH and other insulins [31][32][33]. However, a recent systematic review and network meta-analysis suggests that long-acting insulin analogues were superior to intermediate-acting insulins in key areas including major, serious, and nocturnal hypoglycaemia [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2021 ADA/ EASD guidelines make no distinction between human and analogue insulin [9]. The WHO added long-acting analogues to its Essential Medicines List in its 2021 revision, counter to evidence it had previously found convincing [10,11]. Some people undoubtedly benefit from their use, but across-theboard advantage in terms of glycaemic control has yet to be demonstrated [12].…”
Section: The 'New Insulins' Are Modified Delivery Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-acting insulin analogues were developed to reduce the risk of hypoglycaemia, especially nocturnal hypoglycaemia, producing greater patient convenience through reducing the number of injections (Pedersen-Bjergaard et al, 2014;Rys et al, 2015;Godman et al, 2021a;Chan et al, 2021;Tricco et al, 2021). Whilst there have been concerns over their additional costs versus standard insulins such as NPH insulins, and whether this represents value (Caires de Souza et al, 2014;Almeida et al, 2018;Ewen et al, 2019;Hemmingsen et al, 2021), recent published studies, including systematic reviews, have shown that their higher acquisition costs can be offset by savings from averted costs associated with hypoglycaemia and other complications (Jendle et al, 2020;Lee et al, 2020;Shafie and Ng, 2020;Tricco et al, 2021) generating medium to long-term savings. As a result, long-acting insulin analogues are now the most widely prescribed insulins among high-income and high middle-income countries, with sales growing in other countries including Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries as well as Bangladesh and India (Silver et al, 2018;Ewen et al, 2019;Godman et al, 2021a;Haque et al, 2021a;Godman et al, 2021c;Godman et al, 2021d).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%