“…Historically, factors related to limitations in implant design and/or manufacturing, including bearing surface wear, osteolysis, and mechanical loosening of the prosthesis, were the primary reasons for revision THA [11,17,18]. Owing to technologic and manufacturing advances, better implants and biomaterials have been developed to improve implant longevity [15,32,33]. The reduction in 5-and 7-year adjusted risks of revision THA likely reflects improvements in THA technology, such as large-diameter femoral heads which may have contributed to a reduction in the risk of dislocation, and the introduction of highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings, which have substantially reduced the risk of wear and osteolysis [15,22,25,33].…”