2020
DOI: 10.1364/ol.404173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultimate conversion efficiency bound for the forward double-Λ atom–light coupling scheme

Abstract: We show that for the two widely used configurations of the double- Λ atom–light coupling scheme, one where the control fields are applied in the same Λ -subsystem and another where they are applied in different Λ -subsystems, the forward propagation of the probe and signal fields is described by the same set of equations. We then use optimal control theory to find the spatially dependent optimal control fields that maximize the conversion efficiency f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cases with 0 (red solid line) and / 0 = 1 (blue dashed line) almost coincide, as before, but the case with / 0 = 0.1 (green dashed-dotted line) now deviates substantially. Note that for pulses (35) the derivative of the mixing angle is where recall that T is normalized. Using the maximum value of this θ (for t = t 0 ) in the adiabaticity condition for the original system θ 0 /2 (neglecting dissipation), we obtain the condition 1 2 T 0 (37) which is not satisfied for T = 10 when / 0 = 0.1.…”
Section: Example and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cases with 0 (red solid line) and / 0 = 1 (blue dashed line) almost coincide, as before, but the case with / 0 = 0.1 (green dashed-dotted line) now deviates substantially. Note that for pulses (35) the derivative of the mixing angle is where recall that T is normalized. Using the maximum value of this θ (for t = t 0 ) in the adiabaticity condition for the original system θ 0 /2 (neglecting dissipation), we obtain the condition 1 2 T 0 (37) which is not satisfied for T = 10 when / 0 = 0.1.…”
Section: Example and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that u = θ corresponds to the adiabatic gauge potential which represents nonadiabaticity, and optimal control theory allows us to determine how this control function should be varied in order to maximize the desired objective. The mathematical problem is similar to that of maximizing the conversion efficiency between light beams of different frequency or orbital angular momentum, propagating in a cloud of cold atoms characterized by a double-atom-light coupling scheme [35]. We present the detailed solution below.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cases with Γ ≫ Ω 0 (red solid line) and Γ/Ω 0 = 1 (blue dashed line) almost coincide, as before, but the case with Γ/Ω 0 = 0.1 (green dashed-dotted line) now deviates substantially. Note that for pulses (35) the derivative of the mixing angle is…”
Section: Example and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that u = θ corresponds to the adiabatic gauge potential which represents nonadiabaticity, and optimal control theory allows us to determine how this control function should be varied in order to maximize the desired objective. The mathematical problem is similar to that of maximizing the conversion efficiency between light beams of different frequency or orbital angular momentum, propagating in a cloud of cold atoms characterized by a double-Λ atom-light coupling scheme [35]. We present the detailed solution below.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usage of this protocol is also motivated by our recent work [34] in a different context, involving the double-Λ atom-light coupling scheme. We show there that the performance of the aforementioned protocol, when applied to the dynamical system (6) with R = q = δ = 0, approaches that of the optimal protocol, where the mixing 7).…”
Section: A Simple Sin-cos Control Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%