2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ulna-humerus contact mechanics: Finite element analysis and experimental measurements using a tactile pressure sensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our models were based on rigid body dynamics. However, future studies will also optimize contact parameters and discretized cartilage size by matching a multibody cartilage model with a finite element model of the same cartilage [35,36]. Even with this limitation, our maximum contact pressures were close in range (0.5–5 Mpa) to the values reported in the literature [17,37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Our models were based on rigid body dynamics. However, future studies will also optimize contact parameters and discretized cartilage size by matching a multibody cartilage model with a finite element model of the same cartilage [35,36]. Even with this limitation, our maximum contact pressures were close in range (0.5–5 Mpa) to the values reported in the literature [17,37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In addition, a decrease in mean contact pressure was considered to be indicative of a general decrease in joint contact stresses, which is aligned with clinical goal of the PAO surgery. Similar approaches have been adopted in FE analysis performed for the understanding of the hip and elbow joint contact mechanics [ 21 , 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization and design of the experiment approach were used to determine the contact parameters and the size of discretized cartilage elements from a cadaver study ( Table 1 ). The optimization was done in such a way that the maximum contact pressure and contact area errors were minimized between a multibody model and an identically loaded finite element model [ 27 , 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%