1999
DOI: 10.1080/002075499191481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ULINO: Optimally balancing U-shaped JIT assembly lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
76
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
76
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as a consequence of the just-in-time production principles, recently many lines are being arranged in a U-line. Arranging the stations in a U-line has several advantages over the traditional configuration (Scholl and Klein, 1999). Demand fluctuations can be tackled easily by the U-line relative to the straight-line version due to increased search space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, as a consequence of the just-in-time production principles, recently many lines are being arranged in a U-line. Arranging the stations in a U-line has several advantages over the traditional configuration (Scholl and Klein, 1999). Demand fluctuations can be tackled easily by the U-line relative to the straight-line version due to increased search space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SALOME is chosen as the basis of the ULINO, because it has been shown to be very effective in several computational tests (Scholl and Klein, 1999). ULINO is a branch and bound procedure that performs a depth-first They also state that with a little modification, the proposed algorithm can be applied to many variants of the problem.…”
Section: Ant Colony Optimization Meta-heuristicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A station which handles the same workpiece in two different cycles is called a crossover station. With a U-line, the number of required stations can be smaller than with a regular line (for more details on the UALBP see Miltenburg and Wijngaard, 1994;Nakade et al, 1997;Sparling and Miltenburg, 1998;Urban, 1998;Scholl and Klein, 1999;Miltenburg, 2000;Erel et al, 2001;Chiang and Urban, 2006;.…”
Section: Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%