2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2003.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ULF geomagnetic field measurements in Japan and some recent results associated with Iwateken Nairiku Hokubu earthquake in 1998

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, its high values appear at periods where seismic activity is weak or absent. This stage of the PCA is also known as the Blind Deconvolution method (Hattori et al, 2004a). The best application of this method for the geomagnetic data (H -component of magnetic field, 3 station data set) has been made by Hattori et al (2004b) for the 3 station data set.…”
Section: Traditional Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, its high values appear at periods where seismic activity is weak or absent. This stage of the PCA is also known as the Blind Deconvolution method (Hattori et al, 2004a). The best application of this method for the geomagnetic data (H -component of magnetic field, 3 station data set) has been made by Hattori et al (2004b) for the 3 station data set.…”
Section: Traditional Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognition of anomalous pre-earthquake phenomena has been reported for major earthquakes since 1990 (Fraser-Smith et al, 1990;Bernardi et al, 1991;Molchanov et al, 1992;Kopytenko et al, 1993;Lin and Zeng, 1992;Hayakawa et al, , 1999Hayakawa et al, , 2000Kawate et al, 1998;Gotoh et al, 2002;Hattori et al, 2002Hattori et al, , 2004aHattori, 2004;Liu et al, 2006;Molchanov and Hayakawa, 2008;Chen et al, , 2011Han et al, 2011;Wen et al, 2012). These reports indicate that geomagnetic anomalies prior to earthquakes are caused by either momentary existence of earthquake-related high conductivity materials or the movement of electric current along faults (Zeng et al, 1995;Merzer and Klemperer, 1997;Yen et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, such data could be used in the following objectives: (1) perform the correlation between the ULF and VLF/LF radio signals, for different seismic events, with the atmospheric electrical field and the radon levels; (2) theoretical modelling of the observed phenomena; (3) extend the empirical magnitude versus distance diagram for the detection of abnormal ULF signals preceding HME presented by Hattori et al (2004) to LME (working below the present detection threshold). In fact, since LME were not considered in the former diagram, the extension of such diagram could provide valuable information about the ULF precursory emissions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%