1992
DOI: 10.1016/0196-8858(92)90019-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ulam's searching game with three lies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If ch(0, t 1 , t 2 , t 3 ) ≤ 12 then σ is 4-intervals nice unless it is one of the states in Table 1. [18]. This set coincides with the set of types of well shaped states that are 0-typical but non 4-interval nice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If ch(0, t 1 , t 2 , t 3 ) ≤ 12 then σ is 4-intervals nice unless it is one of the states in Table 1. [18]. This set coincides with the set of types of well shaped states that are 0-typical but non 4-interval nice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Definition 8 (0-typical state [13] [18]) Let σ be a state of type (t 0 , t 1 , t 2 , t 3 ) with ch(t 0 , t 1 , t 2 , t 3 ) = q. We say that σ is 0-typical if the following hold…”
Section: The Proof Of the Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are many papers dealing with the Rényi-Ulam's game. The exact values of L(n, 2, 1), L(n, 2, 2) and L(n, 2, 3) have been determined by Pelc [15], Guzicki [8] and Deppe [7], respectively, building on previous work by Czyzowicz et al [5,6], Negro and Sereno [13,14] and others (see Pelc's survey [17], Hill [9], Cicalese et al [4]). For arbitrary fixed number of lies, Spencer [18] determined the value of L(n, q, e) for sufficiently large integer n. For q = 3, the exact values of L(n, 3, 1) and L(n, 3, 2) have been determined by Pelc [16] and Liu et al [10], respectively, in terms of coin-weighing problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal solutions (for each m) are given in [9,15,16,21], respectively, for the cases = 1, = 2, = 3, and (for all sufficiently large m) for the general case. See [10] for a survey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%