1982
DOI: 10.1086/202924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ulalinka, the Oldest Palaeolithic Site in Siberia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last decade there has been a heightened interest in the Lower Paleolithic of Siberia, and there have been a number of claims of surprisingly great antiquity for early man in the north. Paleomagnetic data reported by Okladnikov and Pospelova (1982) are interpreted by the authors to place the site's main occupation in the Matuyama Reversed Chron, thus making the site older than 730,000 years. The site revealed, from a layer composed of reworked alluvial sediments containing boulders, gravels, and sands, a number of pebble tools selected from the large number of natural cobbles.…”
Section: The Search For the First Inhabitants Of Siberiamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Over the last decade there has been a heightened interest in the Lower Paleolithic of Siberia, and there have been a number of claims of surprisingly great antiquity for early man in the north. Paleomagnetic data reported by Okladnikov and Pospelova (1982) are interpreted by the authors to place the site's main occupation in the Matuyama Reversed Chron, thus making the site older than 730,000 years. The site revealed, from a layer composed of reworked alluvial sediments containing boulders, gravels, and sands, a number of pebble tools selected from the large number of natural cobbles.…”
Section: The Search For the First Inhabitants Of Siberiamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…At Ulalinka, Okladnikov excavated 600 ''prototools'' from a securely dated Middle Pleistocene clay deposit. 32,33 However, these materials do not show evidence of conchoidal fracturing and have been considered by others to be geo-facts. 7,34,35 The Mokhovo and Bereshekhovo sites have been biostratigraphically dated to the Middle Pleistocene, 36,37 but most of the materials from them do not show such signs of human workmanship as obvious platforms, bulbs of percussion, or acute flake angles.…”
Section: Did Lower Paleolithic Hominids Colonize Siberia?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Derevianko 1978;Okladnikov and Pospelova 1982) and those who claim that they are in transposed context in mid-Pleistocene river gravels and not more than 30,000 BP (e.g. 2).…”
Section: Lower Palaeolithicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He related them to other claimed pebble tool sites such as Filimoshki and Ust-Tu in Siberia, but these contain 'artefacts' which are in fact natural and there is a division of opinion between those who consider the Siberian pebble-tool industries as genuinely old (e.g. Derevianko 1978;Okladnikov and Pospelova 1982) and those who claim that they are in transposed context in mid-Pleistocene river gravels and not more than 30,000 BP (e.g. Kato etal.…”
Section: Lower Palaeolithicmentioning
confidence: 99%