1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00134-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UKCCSG study of accelerated radiotherapy for pediatric brain stem gliomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there is some evidence that chemotherapy is beneficial for opticohypothalamic low-grade gliomas [31, 32, 33, 34, 35], no data exist with regard to similar tumors located in the brainstem. Overall, our data further support previous reports [36, 37, 38, 39]on the beneficial aspects of adjuvant radiotherapy and show no role for additional chemotherapy in the management of patients with diffuse gliomas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…While there is some evidence that chemotherapy is beneficial for opticohypothalamic low-grade gliomas [31, 32, 33, 34, 35], no data exist with regard to similar tumors located in the brainstem. Overall, our data further support previous reports [36, 37, 38, 39]on the beneficial aspects of adjuvant radiotherapy and show no role for additional chemotherapy in the management of patients with diffuse gliomas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In this cohort, the response of 12 patients was: 0/3/ 4/5 for complete response/partial response/stable disease/progressive disease. When comparing this to literature data from other populations, there does not appear to be an improvement (Packer et al, 1994;Lewis et al, 1997). Since survival times were not prolonged either (Figure 1), these data suggest that the oral chemotherapy with TRO/VP16 did not add to the antitumour effect of radiotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Increasing the intensity of radiotherapy by hyperfractionation (Packer et al, 1994, and acceleration (Lewis et al, 1997) did not increase the survival further and the sequelae suggest caution with this approach (Freeman et al, 1996). Chemotherapy did not add to the therapeutical success of radiation treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…58,67 Moreover, toxicity is a source of major concern because intratumoral necrosis, steroid dependency, and other chronic factors are frequent. As a result, different collaborative efforts have been investigated to determine the efficacy of chemotherapy for these tumors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%