Emissions Trading and Business
DOI: 10.1007/3-7908-1748-1_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UK’s climate change levy and emissions trading scheme: implications for businesses’ productivity and economic efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This sample was selected for a number of reasons. First, it has been recognized that large companies are among the most proactive companies in the world in environmental amelioration (Okereke, 2007; Levy and Newell, 2000; Varma, 2004; KPMG, 20083). Previous research has identified that large companies in general are likely to be more proactive than smaller ones (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sample was selected for a number of reasons. First, it has been recognized that large companies are among the most proactive companies in the world in environmental amelioration (Okereke, 2007; Levy and Newell, 2000; Varma, 2004; KPMG, 20083). Previous research has identified that large companies in general are likely to be more proactive than smaller ones (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, these companies come from a diverse range of industry sectors, including oil and gas, electricity, mining, chemicals, transport, utilities, and insurance. Secondly, UK FTSE 100 companies are considered to be the most likely to report on environmental activities (Levy and Newell, 2000;Varma, 2004;Okereke, 2007;Spada, 2008). Thirdly, they can be regarded as the most highly capitalised companies listed on the London Stock Exchange as the majority of UK FTSE top 100 companies are also global operations, with business interests in a number of countries.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%