2007
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2006.097642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UK reference data for the Hologic QDR Discovery dual-energy x ray absorptiometry scanner in healthy children and young adults aged 6-17 years

Abstract: This article provides the first sex-specific and ethnicity-specific reference databases for UK, which should allow the clinician to assess bone mineral density in paediatric patients, measured by the Hologic QDR Discovery DXA scanner.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
69
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
69
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Mathematical models were established to calculate the volumetric BMD or bone mineral apparent density, where height, bone area and bone width are considered to avoid under-or overestimation of bone status. 16,18,19,22 Considering such models, a slight decline in bone mineral apparent density of the femoral neck with increasing age has been observed in primary school children, which is in contrast to our findings. 16,19 A comparison of our QUS reference data with other QUS reference data should be made with caution.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Mathematical models were established to calculate the volumetric BMD or bone mineral apparent density, where height, bone area and bone width are considered to avoid under-or overestimation of bone status. 16,18,19,22 Considering such models, a slight decline in bone mineral apparent density of the femoral neck with increasing age has been observed in primary school children, which is in contrast to our findings. 16,19 A comparison of our QUS reference data with other QUS reference data should be made with caution.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…16,18,19,22 Considering such models, a slight decline in bone mineral apparent density of the femoral neck with increasing age has been observed in primary school children, which is in contrast to our findings. 16,19 A comparison of our QUS reference data with other QUS reference data should be made with caution. Most of the studies used different methods for calculating reference values or applied different QUS devices (for example, CUBA, Sahara, Sunlight Omnisense) with different measures (for example, speed of sound, broadband ultrasound attenuation) on different body sites (for Reference…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…40 To correct for body size, bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) was calculated for the lumbar spine, 41 and measures of WB BMC/height were examined. We used the approach described by Mølgaard et al, 42 as modified by Ward et al 43 for Hologic densitometers, to determine measures of BMC for bone area (BA) and BA for height. The coefficients of variation for lumbar spine and WB BMD were 1.1% and 0.8% and those for fat and lean mass were 2.1% and 1.0%, respectively.…”
Section: Bone-density and Body-composition Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%