UK consumers' willingness to pay for laying hen welfare

Abstract

PurposeThis study investigates UK consumers’ perception and willingness to pay (WTP) for egg attributes associated with laying hen welfare, namely with beak-trimming practices and injurious feather pecking (IP). The aim is to examine any change in WTP after improved consumer awareness.Design/methodology/approachBuilding upon existing literature, the authors designed an online survey in which the method of discrete choice experiment (DCE) was employed. The study includes two identical DCEs with the second being introduced after respondents were presented with an educational excerpt about beak-trimming practices, on farm IP occurrence and the docile nature of white egg laying hens – reducing IP.FindingsThe mixed logit regression model demonstrated that consumers' WTP for egg attributes associated with beak trimming and IP decreased in the second DCE (12.6% for organic and 2.55% for free-range). For eggshell colour, the analysis revealed a shift from a preference to brown eggs to indifference between eggshell colours.Originality/valueOverall, UK consumers have a preference in higher hen welfare resulting in a decrease in WTP once they are aware of welfare losses in current systems; however, more insights are required in terms of the promotion of white shelled eggs as a means of reducing IP on UK farms.

Go Green or Green Will Go: Exploring the Nexuses between Covert & Guerrilla Marketing and Ecological Buying Behavior in Food Sector

“…Summing up all these findings, it shows that a higher level of evangelism for the brand and good environmental knowledge results in a high level of ecological buying behaviour in consumers, especially in dealing with eatable products. The results are coherently consistent with the existing literature (Badrinarayanan & Sierra, 2018;Li, et al, 2020;Dunne & Siettou, 2020), whereas some identified gaps are also bridged by the present findings (Sun, Su, Guo, & Tian, 2021; Musa, Mansor, & Musa, 2020; Karunarathna, Bandara, Silva, & De Mel, 2020). These findings direct practitioners to move from traditional marketing tactics towards novel covert or overt marketing techniques.…”

“…Literature also explored well that environmental knowledge and being conscious in human actions are the factors for behaviour building (Goh & Balaji, 2016). Similarly, a study in the context of UK consumers assures the significant consideration of environmental factors in their mindset, especially while paying for eatable products (Dunne & Siettou, 2020). Under the pandemic situation and increasing trends in environmental consideration, customers had developed a positive attitude toward reducing the adverse environmental effect of their product buying and consumption (Cheung & To, 2019; Chen, Hung, Wang, Huang, & Liao, 2017).…”

How to Improve Food Quality in the Domestic Market: The Role of “Same Line Same Standard Same Quality”—Evidence from a Consumer Choice Experiment in China

“…First, compared to the self-declared claim "export quality", consumers prefer the Santong claim. Previous studies have indicated that consumers pay attention to food products with production claims, including production systems, production methods and processing methods [60][61][62][63][64]. Asante-Addo and Weible [65] reported that consumer utility increases when an antibiotic/hormone-free claim is made for a meat product.…”

Impacts of consumers’ perceived risks in eco-design packaging on food wastage behaviors

“…For instance, previous studies indicated higher consumers’ WTP for food health, safety and nutrition concerns (e.g. Talwar, 2021; Dunne and Siettou, 2020; Konuk, 2018). Moreover, as packaging plays a crucial role in linking food quality and consumers through its functions such as communication, conservation and preservation, an increasing number of consumers are willing to pay a premium for eco-friendly packaged products.…”