Uganda’s experience with debt and economic growth: an empirical analysis of the effect of public debt on economic growth—1980–2016

Abstract

Background: Empirical evidence on the effect of public debt on the economic growth of a country remains ambiguous. No theoretical convergence on the respective nexus has been attained. For the case of Uganda in particular, the public debt question remains critical in the country's development trajectory. Under the Highly Indebted Poor Countries (HIPCs) initiative, Uganda was the first country to receive a debt relief of worth US$650 million in the 1990s and later in 2006, under the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI), the country generously received 100% debt forgiveness/cancelation which consequently reduced the stock of country's debt to $1.6 billion. However, of recent, the debt stock has kept on increasing from UGX 14.257 trillion ($5.5 billion) in 2000 to the current UGX 35.3 trillion (9.8b) in July 2017 and it is projected to continue increasing in the short to medium term given the robust NDPII core projects and priorities which are set to attract more borrowing. The study employs the Auto Regressive Distributed Lag (ARDL)-bounds testing approach which is superior and suitable for our small sample. Results: The results reveal that public debt has a significant negative impact on economic growth in short run whereas in long-run debt has a mixed impact on Uganda's economy. The total debt service has a negative impact whereas Gross debt as a share of GDP has a positive impact on the economy. The findings also reveal that Public debt has a negative effect on Uganda's economic growth in the short run. The impact is however found to be positive in the long run. This result is in line with the study expectations and some findings by earlier researchers who found a negative impact of public debt on GDP and investment. The results suggest that the current trend of Uganda's borrowing is to continue constraining the resources in the short run. Conclusion: The conclusion of the study in view of emerging findings especially on debt, various policy implications have emerged. At the current rate of borrowing, Uganda is likely to have deteriorating economic growth partly because such public borrowing adversely affects investment. The study thus recommends for policies geared toward efficient use of borrowed funds especially for such projects that have high potential to unlock the production capabilities of the country. There is a need for

Entrepreneurship a Misguided Quest: A Higher Education Review

“…Although Uganda's GDP has improved since 2010, save for the two years of Covid-19 (2020Covid-19 ( -2022, the economy is still fragile to compete, generate jobs, increase incomes, and provide products and services to the population in desirable amounts (Ellen & Peter, 2016;Oxfam, 2016). This is in congruence with Ssempala, Ssebulime, and Twinoburyo (2020) whose claims allude to the view that the borrowed monies from the World Bank, IMF, and Exim Bank have in many ways affected Uganda's GDP to persuade one to think that the economy is doing well whereas not. Economic growth and university education are inseparable; therefore, refocusing our energy and resources into university business by way of recontextualizing the curricula to the local realities, empowering academics in all fields by granting them academic freedom and independence, adopting purposeful yet stimulating teaching and learning techniques, extending reasonable funding to researchers, and mindset transformation of all key stakeholders may become a good step in realizing the long-awaited innovation in Uganda's Higher Education (HE).…”

Pre-COVID-19 evaluation of external debt, corruption and economic growth in South Africa

“…For instance, Owusu-Nantwi and Erickson (2016) showed that a bidirectional relationship with positive effect exists for public debt and GDP in Ghana but a weak association for Nigeria as shown in Ogunmuyiwa (2011). Tchereni et al (2013) produced a statistically insignificant negative relationship for Malawi while the result of the study by Ssempala et al (2020) on Uganda produced mixed long run effects and statistically negative impact in the short run. Saungweme and Odhiambo (2019a) employed a dynamic multivariate ARDL bounds test approach on servicing of debt, public debt, GDP for Zambia and came up with a unidirectional causality result that runs public debt through economic growth.…”

“…This is also consistent with the postulation of the Keynesians that at certain level, public debt can impact positively on growth. Corruption and inflation are negatively and statistically significant in their relationship with economic growth while external debt servicing effect on growth is negative although, it is not statistically significant (see Akram, 2017; Kim et al , 2017; Ssempala et al , 2020). For instance, if corruption increases by 1%, the implication on growth will be 0.28% decrease while a 1% increase in the level of inflation will bring down growth by 0.13%.…”

Comparative Performance of Trade Openness and Sovereign Debt Accumulation in Fostering Economic Growth of Sub-Saharan African Countries

“…Domestic debt that stood at 52% of GDP in 2004 declined to 24% in 2019, whereas foreign debt rose to 78% in 1994 and declined to 38% in 2019 (World Bank, 2020). The direct effect of both trade openness and sovereign debt on economic growth has been extensively investigated in several studies, such as Osei-Assibey and Dikgang (2020), Ssempala et al (2020) and Asteriou et al (2021). However, the interactive effect has not been given due attention, which creates a knowledge gap that needs to be filled.…”