Uganda: No More Pro‐poor Growth?

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. This article illustrates changing growth regimes in Uganda from pro-poor growth in the 1990s to growth without poverty reduction, actually even a slight increase in poverty, after 2000. Not surprisingly, we find that good agricultural performance is the key determinant of direct pro-poor growth in the 1990s as well as lower agricultural growth is the root cause of the recent increase in poverty. Yet after 2000, low agricultural growth appears to have induced important employment shifts out of agriculture, which have dampened the increase in poverty. We also assess the indirect way of pro-poor growth by analysing the incidence of public spending and the tax system and find that indirect pro-poor growth has only been achieved to a limited extend. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may

The Impact Of Commodity Price Changes On Rural Households : The Case Of Coffee In Uganda

“…This general conclusion is corroborated in a descriptive analysis by Kappel et al (2005) who find that coffee districts contributed more than non-coffee districts to the overall poverty reduction between 1992/93 and 1999/2000.…”

Escaping poverty and becoming poor in 36 villages of Central and Western Uganda

“…Business gains were often associated with such land-related activities (as also found by Kappel, Lay and Steiner, 2005). These two factors were significantly associated with escape for 38 per cent of Category B households.…”

“…However, reduced poverty in the 1990s may have gone hand-in hand with increased inequality (Appleton, 2001b;Deininger and Okidi, 2003;Hickey, 2005) and the degree to which different segments of the population can take advantage of and benefit from further growth-induced opportunities is in doubt (Okidi and Mugambe, 2002;Mijumbi and Okidi, 2001;Ssewanyana et al, 2004). Poverty reduction may have slowed down after 2000 (Kappel, Lay and Steiner, 2005) and the extent to associated with a much larger number of escapes from poverty, and finding regular employment has been associated with many fewer escapes. Because jobs have not been more significant, education also does not have a strong association with escaping poverty.…”

Do Overlapping Land Rights Reduce Agricultural Investment? Evidence from Uganda

“…With more than 85% of the population still living in rural areas and agriculture accounting for 77% of employment and 50% of total output (Belshaw et al 1999), land-related investment will be critical for growth and poverty (Kappel et al 2005), something that is often attributed to limited agricultural productivity growth (Republic of Uganda 2005), implies that ways to increase agricultural productivity will be critical to prevent widening of rural-urban income gaps.…”