2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2112.10415
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UFPMP-Det: Toward Accurate and Efficient Object Detection on Drone Imagery

Abstract: This paper proposes a novel approach to object detection on drone imagery, namely Multi-Proxy Detection Network with Unified Foreground Packing (UFPMP-Det). To deal with the numerous instances of very small scales, different from the common solution that divides the high-resolution input image into quite a number of chips with low foreground ratios to perform detection on them each, the Unified Foreground Packing (UFP) module is designed, where the sub-regions given by a coarse detector are initially merged th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, the deep learning method has been widely used in aerial object detection. The proposed MStrans was compared with some detection frameworks, including the detection framework based on CNN (i.e., UFPMP-Det [8], ClusDet [4], and GLSAN [5]) and the detection framework based on transformer (i.e., TPH [27], ViT-YOLO [24], TRD [23], and LeViT [56]).…”
Section: Comparison Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In recent years, the deep learning method has been widely used in aerial object detection. The proposed MStrans was compared with some detection frameworks, including the detection framework based on CNN (i.e., UFPMP-Det [8], ClusDet [4], and GLSAN [5]) and the detection framework based on transformer (i.e., TPH [27], ViT-YOLO [24], TRD [23], and LeViT [56]).…”
Section: Comparison Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the evaluation metrics used in [4,5,8], this study chose average precision (AP) and APs at the threshold of 0.5 (𝐴𝑃 ) and 0.75 (𝐴𝑃 ) to evaluate aerial object detection performance. Meanwhile, the variants of AP were also taken as evaluation metrics, including 𝐴𝑃 , 𝐴𝑃 , and 𝐴𝑃 for the object instances in a small, medium, and large size on the DOTA dataset and DIOR dataset.…”
Section: B Evaluations Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clustering guided cropping [14][15][16][17]; β€’ Density-map based cropping [18][19][20]; β€’ Reinforcement-learning based cropping [21,22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can be obviously seen that this kind of cropping approach has less efficiency nor accuracy. Thus, more and more studies began to focus on cropping methods based on clustering [14][15][16][17], density mapping [18][19][20], and reinforcement-learning [21,22]. The detectors utilizing these three manners usually contain two-stage networks: the first are cropping images with coarse-grained detectors which can describe object distribution; and then there is detecting and classifying images with a fine-grained detector.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%