2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(20000301)85:5<703::aid-ijc17>3.0.co;2-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UCN-01 selectively enhances mitomycin C cytotoxicity in p53 defective cells which is mediated through S and/or G2 checkpoint abrogation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
37
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
7
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of UCN-01 and AG490 produced a synergistic inhibition in p53 mutant cell lines, based on the observation that the CI was substantially less than 1, whereas an antagonistic effect was observed in p53 wild type cell lines (data not shown). These results suggest that the potentiation of UCN-01 cytotoxicity by AG490 was selectively manifested in cells with defective p53 function, which resembles the results observed in other tumor types with combination of UCN-01 with cisdiamminedichloroplatinum (CDDP), camptothecin, mitomycin C, and irradiation [10,11,16,27].…”
Section: Combinatorial Efficacy Of Ag490 and Ucn-01 In Glioma Cell LIsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The combination of UCN-01 and AG490 produced a synergistic inhibition in p53 mutant cell lines, based on the observation that the CI was substantially less than 1, whereas an antagonistic effect was observed in p53 wild type cell lines (data not shown). These results suggest that the potentiation of UCN-01 cytotoxicity by AG490 was selectively manifested in cells with defective p53 function, which resembles the results observed in other tumor types with combination of UCN-01 with cisdiamminedichloroplatinum (CDDP), camptothecin, mitomycin C, and irradiation [10,11,16,27].…”
Section: Combinatorial Efficacy Of Ag490 and Ucn-01 In Glioma Cell LIsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Thus it appears, at least in colorectal tumour cell lines, that inhibition of the IR-induced G2 checkpoint is not necessarily associated with sensitisation to IR. This in contrast to other reports which have shown that UCN-01 is able to sensitise tumour cells to a range of DNA damaging agents, including IR (Akinaga et al, 1993;Bunch and Eastman, 1996;Wang et al, 1996;Shao et al, 1997;Sugiyama et al, 2000). There are other reported cases where abrogation of the G2 checkpoint is not always associated with sensitisation to DNA damage-induced apoptosis (Musk, 1991;Ribeiro et al, 1999) however in these cases the G2 checkpoint was overcome by caffeine.…”
Section: Experimental Therapeuticscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…The actions of Chk1 inhibitors in potentiating the toxicity of S phase DNAdamaging agents are likely independent of p53 status (Shao et al, 1997;Sugiyama et al, 2000;Eastman et al, 2002;Kohn et al, 2002), thus making them attractive for therapeutic uses. The exact extent of DNA damage caused by such mechanism-based combinations is unknown, but evidence supports the postulation that increases in apoptosis after checkpoint abrogation is caused by collapsing of replication forks.…”
Section: Checkpoint Dysregulationmentioning
confidence: 99%