2017
DOI: 10.1145/3012284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ubiquitous Access to Digital Cultural Heritage

Abstract: The digitization initiatives in the past decades have led to a tremendous increase in digitized objects in the cultural heritage domain. Although digitally available, these objects are often not easily accessible for interested users because of the distributed allocation of the content in different repositories and the variety in data structure and standards. When users search for cultural content, they first need to identify the specific repository and then need to know how to search within this platform (e.g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But the proposed solution in this paper preserves all the properties that have made blockchains so attractive, it is an open platform with the right balance of cryptography, addressing energy issues, post-quantum computing issues, IoT readiness, and related important business issues inked to tourism. It is also worth adding that the presented solution is in line with the recent incentives to enable ubiquitous access to digital heritage [42] by providing digital infrastructures for cultural heritage [43].…”
Section: Discussion and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…But the proposed solution in this paper preserves all the properties that have made blockchains so attractive, it is an open platform with the right balance of cryptography, addressing energy issues, post-quantum computing issues, IoT readiness, and related important business issues inked to tourism. It is also worth adding that the presented solution is in line with the recent incentives to enable ubiquitous access to digital heritage [42] by providing digital infrastructures for cultural heritage [43].…”
Section: Discussion and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…While more marks can be added, we estimate 2 search sessions as lower bound for a useful query navigation support and as a good trade-off between usefulness and support for limited screen-size. QueryCrumbs have been integrated as a visual history tool into a browser plugin for contextualized access to cultural heritage content 3 [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digital method proposed in this article aims to define new interactive ways to document, visualize, and curate searchable archaeological data using immersive virtual environments connected to a remote Structured Query Language (SQL) database server. To design and develop such a method, our work builds upon influential contributions that focus on ontologies for cultural objects (Kakali et al 2007;Havemann et al 2009;Hyvönen 2009;Niccolucci, Hermon, and Doerr 2015), networked methods for cultural data archives and dissemination (Power et al 2017;Seifert et al 2017), visualization and annotation of 3D architectural and archaeological models in real-time (Poyart et al 2011;Snyder 2014), and user interfaces for the digital publication of archaeological excavations (R. Opitz and Johnson 2016).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%