1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80231-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ubiquitin Ligase Activity and Tyrosine Phosphorylation Underlie Suppression of Growth Factor Signaling by c-Cbl/Sli-1

Abstract: Receptor desensitization is accomplished by accelerated endocytosis and degradation of ligand-receptor complexes. An in vitro reconstituted system indicates that Cbl adaptor proteins directly control downregulation of the receptor for the epidermal growth factor (EGFR) by recruiting ubiquitin-activating and -conjugating enzymes. We infer a sequential process initiated by autophosphorylation of EGFR at a previously identified lysosome-targeting motif that subsequently recruits Cbl. This is followed by tyrosine … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

50
935
3
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 904 publications
(989 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
50
935
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, autophosphorylation of EGFR can have either a positive or a negative role in the regulation of EGFR activity depending upon the site and temporal–spatial balance. We hypothesized that absence of two major negative regulatory phosphorylation sites at Y1016 and Y1069, in the L858R/CYF10, Ex19Del/CYF10 or Ex20Ins/CYF10 EGFR mutants are sufficient to induce oncogenic signaling cascades through aberrant activation of the Ras‐ERK signaling and loss of EGFR ubiquitination and subsequent receptor degradation, respectively 31, 32. However, this is not the case in wild‐type EGFR/CYF10 mutants, suggesting that ligand induced multiple autophosphorylation is required for cellular transformation in wild‐type EGFR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, autophosphorylation of EGFR can have either a positive or a negative role in the regulation of EGFR activity depending upon the site and temporal–spatial balance. We hypothesized that absence of two major negative regulatory phosphorylation sites at Y1016 and Y1069, in the L858R/CYF10, Ex19Del/CYF10 or Ex20Ins/CYF10 EGFR mutants are sufficient to induce oncogenic signaling cascades through aberrant activation of the Ras‐ERK signaling and loss of EGFR ubiquitination and subsequent receptor degradation, respectively 31, 32. However, this is not the case in wild‐type EGFR/CYF10 mutants, suggesting that ligand induced multiple autophosphorylation is required for cellular transformation in wild‐type EGFR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the intracellular domain of the EGFRvIII is not mutated and thus the Cbl protein-binding sites are intact. The Cbl proteins bind the phosphorylated EGFR (Levkowitz et al, 1999) and the phosphorylation pattern of active EGFRvIII is similar to that of the activated WT EGFR (Fernandes et al, 2001). The inability of the Cbl proteins to interact with or downregulate the EGFRvIII suggested a novel mechanism regulating the interaction between the EGFRvIII and the Cbl proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Cbl proteins (Cbl, Cbl-b, and Cbl-c) are negative regulators of WT EGFR signaling (Ettenberg et al, 1999a(Ettenberg et al, , b, 2001Keane et al, 1999;Levkowitz et al, 1999;Waterman et al, 1999a;Yokouchi et al, 1999;Duan et al, 2003). The Cbl proteins all contain an aminoterminal TK-binding (TKB) domain, a RING finger domain, and a region of proline-rich sequences in their carboxy-terminus (Nau and Lipkowitz, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike most other membrane receptors, ErbB3 does not undergo degradation by lysosomes 9, 10, but is degraded by proteasomes catalysed by Nrdp1 5, 11. The overexpression of ErbB3 has been reported to contribute to tumour malignancy and therapeutic resistance in cancers 12, 13, 14, 15.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%