Uber versus Taxi: A Driver’s Eye View

Abstract

Rideshare drivers pay a proportion of their fares to a ride-hailing platform operator, a commission-based compensation model used by many service providers. To Uber drivers, this commission is known as the Uber fee. By contrast, traditional taxi drivers in most US cities make a fixed payment independent of their earnings, usually a weekly or daily medallion lease, keeping every fare dollar net of lease costs and other expenses. We assess these compensation models using an experiment that offered random samples of Boston Uber drivers opportunities to lease a virtual taxi medallion that eliminates the Uber fee. Some drivers were offered a negative fee. Drivers’ labor supply response to our offers reveals a large intertemporal substitution elasticity, on the order of 1.2, and higher for those who accept lease contracts. At the same time, our virtual lease program was undersubscribed: many drivers who would have benefited from buying an inexpensive lease chose to sit out. We use these results to compute the average compensation required to make drivers indifferent between rideshare and taxi-style compensation contracts. The results suggest that rideshare drivers gain considerably from the opportunity to drive without leasing. (JEL J22, J31, L84, L92)

When should grocery stores adopt time‐based pricing? Impact of competition and negative congestion externality

“…The rise of ride-hailing services has motivated researchers to examine various facets of surge pricing (Angrist et al, 2021;Bai et al, 2019;Cachon et al, 2017;Chen & Sheldon, 2015;Guda & Subramanian, 2019;Ke et al, 2020;Taylor, 2018). This research stream is based on a monopoly setting.…”

“…Recent studies examine how employing “smart meters” to alert consumers about peak prices can reduce consumers' energy usage during peak periods (e.g., Burkhardt et al., 2018). The rise of ride‐hailing services has motivated researchers to examine various facets of surge pricing (Angrist et al., 2021; Bai et al., 2019; Cachon et al., 2017; Chen & Sheldon, 2015; Guda & Subramanian, 2019; Ke et al., 2020; Taylor, 2018). This research stream is based on a monopoly setting.…”

How Ride‐Sharing Is Shaping Public Transit System: A Counterfactual Estimator Approach

“…Chen et al (2017) showed that Uber drivers benefit significantly from real-time flexibility in both setting a customized work schedule and also adjusting it throughout the day. Angrist et al (2017) compared the differences in the compensation arrangements available to traditional taxi and ridesharing drivers and evaluated the economic value of ride-sharing work opportunities for drivers. Cook et al (2018) found that although the sharing economy brings more flexibility in employment, there still exists a significant gender earning gap among Uber drivers.…”

The Improvements of Sharing Economy on the Development of Economy in the United States

“…As for the research in the UK, people named Joshua Angrist mainly focus on the parameters that decide the share-taxi trade-off that includes labor supply elasticity which tells us how working hours relate to change in wages and the lease aversion [3]. Also, the attitude of drivers towards leasing functions as well.…”