1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf02007261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Über Teilsysteme von $$\bar \Theta $$ ({g})

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our construction of string-localized fields is based on Tomita-Takeski modular theory (see [15] for a survey of its applications to quantum field theory) in the context of modular localization for Poincaré covariant positive energy representations [7,16,17,18,19]. A full treatment in the modular setting will be given in [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our construction of string-localized fields is based on Tomita-Takeski modular theory (see [15] for a survey of its applications to quantum field theory) in the context of modular localization for Poincaré covariant positive energy representations [7,16,17,18,19]. A full treatment in the modular setting will be given in [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the modular duality results of [7] it follows that such operators must be contained in the intersection of the operator algebras generated by string field operators localized in wedge domains containing the bounded localization domain, so the question is whether the intersections of the wedge algebras contain nontrivial local operators. A sufficent condition based on nuclearity properties of modular operators has very recently been given in [18] but it is restricted to space-time dimensions not larger than two and hence not applicable in the present case without modifications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…). Therefore the uniform ∆ 0 reflection principle ∀x(∆ 0 (x) ∧ Pr R 1 (x) → True ∆0 (x)) for Pr R 1 (x) is provable in PA. 3 Before proving our results, we introduce some terminology and prove a lemma. We assume that our logical symbols are only ∧, ¬ and ∀, and other logical symbols such as → and ∃ are introduced as abbreviations.…”
Section: For Any Formulas ϕ and ψ Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other sets of derivability conditions which are sufficient for the second incompleteness theorem have been proposed by Jeroslow [10], Montagna [21] and Buchholz [3] (see also [16]). On the other hand, the second incompleteness theorem does not hold for some provability predicates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%