1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf00277501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Über die ossifikation der extremitaten bei neugeborenen Primaten (Mammalia)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Callitrichids also deviate from other anthropoids in having less developed deciduous and permanent dentition at birth (Smith et al, ), and they develop and erupt their teeth earlier than other anthropoids (Macho, , Smith, ) consistent with our hypothesis posed here. However, it is important to note that generalizing the hypothetical relationship between dental development and body size distills callitrichid development down to overall growth rate, and it has been shown that growth rates of the skeleton and dentition vary among callitrichids (Glaser, ; Smith et al, ), although they do tend to have a slower growth rate than other anthropoids (e.g., Montgomery and Mundy, ). Overall, the timing of dental development likely has a phylogenetic signal in primates comparable to what is seen for other ontogenetic dental traits, such as permanent tooth eruption sequence (Monson and Hlusko, ), with callitrichids deviating from other anthropoids in having slower growth rates and earlier tooth eruption (Smith, ; Macho, ; Montgomery and Mundy, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Callitrichids also deviate from other anthropoids in having less developed deciduous and permanent dentition at birth (Smith et al, ), and they develop and erupt their teeth earlier than other anthropoids (Macho, , Smith, ) consistent with our hypothesis posed here. However, it is important to note that generalizing the hypothetical relationship between dental development and body size distills callitrichid development down to overall growth rate, and it has been shown that growth rates of the skeleton and dentition vary among callitrichids (Glaser, ; Smith et al, ), although they do tend to have a slower growth rate than other anthropoids (e.g., Montgomery and Mundy, ). Overall, the timing of dental development likely has a phylogenetic signal in primates comparable to what is seen for other ontogenetic dental traits, such as permanent tooth eruption sequence (Monson and Hlusko, ), with callitrichids deviating from other anthropoids in having slower growth rates and earlier tooth eruption (Smith, ; Macho, ; Montgomery and Mundy, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies investigated ossification sequences in mammalian taxa, particularly in the first half of the 20 th Century (Adams, 1992; Glaser, 1970; Hodges, 1953; Johnson, 1933; Mall, 1906; O’Rahilly & E., 1975; O’Rahilly & Gardner, 1972; Petri, 1935; Prochel, Vogel & Sanchez‐Villagra, 2004; Sánchez‐Villagra, 2002; Schaeffer, 1931, 1934; Strong, 1925). Curgy (1965) reviewed the literature on the ossification sequences of the entire skeleton of mammalian taxa, including carnivores, ungulates, rodents, and primates.…”
Section: Ossification In Extant Tetrapodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Special attention was given to the hand/wrist skeleton because this anatomical area contains a large number of developing osseous centers and is commonly used as a general index of skeletal development [Galliari, 1988;Glaser, 1970;Phillips, 1976;Schultea et al, 1983;Tanner et al, 1972;Thurm et al, 1975;Watts, 1971Watts, , 1975. The state of secondary ossification was classified into three stages of development, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%