1933
DOI: 10.1007/bf01452848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Über die Erfüllbarkeit derjenigen Zählausdrücke, welche in der Normalform zwei benachbarte Allzeichen enthalten

Abstract: U b e r d i e E r f i i U b a r k e i t d e~j e n i g e n Z~h l a u s d r f i c k e , w e l c h e i n d e r N o r m a l f o r m z w e i b e n a c h b a r t e A l l z e i e h e n e n t h a l t e n . Von L~szl6 K a l m s in Szeged (Ungarn).Einleitung.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

1955
1955
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Let L 2 denote the class of rst order sentences with two variables over a relational vocabulary, and let C 2 p denote L 2 extended with additional quanti ers \there exists exactly (at most, at least) i", for i p. Finally, let C 2 be the union of C 2 p taken over all integers p. We prove that the problem of satis ability of sentences of C 2 1 is NEXPTIME-complete. Problems concerning decidability of restricted classes of quanti cational formulas have been studied since the second decade of this century by many logicians including W. Ackermann, P. Bernays, K. G odel, L. Kalm ar, M. Sch on nkel, T. Skolem, H. Wang 1,2,5,11,12,24,33,34,35,37] and many others. In the late twenties and in the thirties (see 7] and 19] for more informations) the study of classi cation of solvable classes of prenex formulas was one of the most active areas of logic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let L 2 denote the class of rst order sentences with two variables over a relational vocabulary, and let C 2 p denote L 2 extended with additional quanti ers \there exists exactly (at most, at least) i", for i p. Finally, let C 2 be the union of C 2 p taken over all integers p. We prove that the problem of satis ability of sentences of C 2 1 is NEXPTIME-complete. Problems concerning decidability of restricted classes of quanti cational formulas have been studied since the second decade of this century by many logicians including W. Ackermann, P. Bernays, K. G odel, L. Kalm ar, M. Sch on nkel, T. Skolem, H. Wang 1,2,5,11,12,24,33,34,35,37] and many others. In the late twenties and in the thirties (see 7] and 19] for more informations) the study of classi cation of solvable classes of prenex formulas was one of the most active areas of logic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [26] formulae with prefixes in ∃ * ∀ * and without functions are considered. Formulae with prefixes in ∃ * ∀ 2 ∃ * and without functions and equality predicates are tackled in [11], [24] and [27]. Formulae without equality predicate, and with unary predicate and functions are studied in [19] and [12].…”
Section: The Function Elimination Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(The decidability proofs of Kalmir [10], Schfitte [12], and G6del [8] for prenex formulas with prefixes W3 ---3 are of this form, as are many proofs in [6].) must verify PalfA(ala2) if d falsifies Paja2, and must falsify Pajf1(aja2) if it verifies Paja2.…”
Section: Predicate Letters Of F and Arguments From U Under Which The mentioning
confidence: 99%