1958
DOI: 10.1002/zaac.19582970313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Über das Kationenaustauschvermögen der Tonminerale. I. Vergleich der Untersuchungsmethoden

Abstract: Die verschiedenen Methoden zur Bestimmung des Kationenaustauschvermögens der Tonminerale und Tone wurden experimentell miteinander verglichen und der Einfluß der Verweilzeit in der Austauschlösung, des pH‐Wertes, der Art der Anionen und der Trocknung vor der Bestimmung untersucht. Um genaue Werte zu erhalten, ist eine quantitative Stoffbilanz unter Erfassung aller Kationen und Anionen in der Austauschlösung und im Bodenkörper erforderlich. Für Untersuchungen an natürlichen oder technisch aufbereiteten Kaolinen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

1963
1963
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the smooth, well-defined surface of muscovite sheets, they are widely used as substrates for surface force measurements (6 -9). Nonetheless, only few studies on surface reactions have been performed with muscovite compared to other clay minerals (10,11). This is probably due to the low surface cation exchange capacity (CEC) of muscovite, which is typically 0.01-0.05 mmol/g, i.e., more than 1 order of magnitude smaller than that of montmorillonite or vermiculite (0.5-2 mmol/g) (1,10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Due to the smooth, well-defined surface of muscovite sheets, they are widely used as substrates for surface force measurements (6 -9). Nonetheless, only few studies on surface reactions have been performed with muscovite compared to other clay minerals (10,11). This is probably due to the low surface cation exchange capacity (CEC) of muscovite, which is typically 0.01-0.05 mmol/g, i.e., more than 1 order of magnitude smaller than that of montmorillonite or vermiculite (0.5-2 mmol/g) (1,10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A more widely used method to determine the CEC, which became the reference method, is based on saturating the mineral surface with ammonium ions. The NH + 4 is then displaced and measured by micro-Kjeldahl distillation (15)(16)(17). Both methods are laborious and time consuming, and need special equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, muscovite seems to be more The ion exchange properties of natural aluminosilicates stable against acids than montmorillonite ( 14,15 ) . Gaines have been recognized for over a century.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%