2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12518-015-0165-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UAV monitoring and documentation of a large landslide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
62
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last cases, the propagation errors are also taken into account showing values lower than 0.05 m. These errors are of the same order of magnitude than the image resolution, as it has been described in previous comparable studies [26,32,34,38,42,44,45] with similar properties (equipment, flight altitude and resolution).…”
Section: Accuracies Errors and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the last cases, the propagation errors are also taken into account showing values lower than 0.05 m. These errors are of the same order of magnitude than the image resolution, as it has been described in previous comparable studies [26,32,34,38,42,44,45] with similar properties (equipment, flight altitude and resolution).…”
Section: Accuracies Errors and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…RMS errors also show values of the same order of magnitude of those calculated in this work at GNSS-based and transferred check points, and those found in the aforementioned studies with similar properties. In these studies, the RMS calculated in GNSS-based check points are in the range of 0.05-0.10 m [32,38,45] or even higher [34]. In a lower resolution study [31], a value of 0.50 m is found in the comparison of UAV and LiDAR DSMs, where DSM check points are used in the same way as in this study.…”
Section: Accuracies Errors and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This topic has been described by several authors (Dewitte et al, 2008;Turner and Lucieer, 2013;Travelletti et al, 2012;Lucieer et al 2014a;Turner et al, 2015;Marek et al, 2015;Lindner et al, 2016;Peppa et al, 2017). In these works, numerous techniques based on the multi-temporal comparison of RPAS data sets for the definition of the evolution of landslides have been presented and discussed.…”
Section: Landslide Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been developed in recent years and have played unparalleled roles in eco-environmental monitoring, environmental protection, urban construction and planning and have been used to provide accurate estimates of agricultural production and real-time data acquisition during natural disaster (e.g., snowstorms and landslides) monitoring periods [39][40][41]. At present, UAVs equipped with digital cameras are critical for acquiring high-resolution remote sensing data, which serve as beneficial supplements to ground (camera) and high-altitude (satellite) observational data [42,43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%