2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2018.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UAV for mapping shrubland vegetation: Does fusion of spectral and vertical information derived from a single sensor increase the classification accuracy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The segmentation results also clearly differentiate between the bare soil and the vegetation, even in the presence of small patches. As reported in recent studies that performed forest tree classification [18,59], the additional information provided by the DSM and NDVI significantly improves the delimitation and discrimination of segments, which was true in our case as well. This is more relevant in conditions in which the three vegetation layers are spatially close, because discrimination based only on spectral information has proven very difficult to achieve in such environments.…”
Section: Segmentationsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The segmentation results also clearly differentiate between the bare soil and the vegetation, even in the presence of small patches. As reported in recent studies that performed forest tree classification [18,59], the additional information provided by the DSM and NDVI significantly improves the delimitation and discrimination of segments, which was true in our case as well. This is more relevant in conditions in which the three vegetation layers are spatially close, because discrimination based only on spectral information has proven very difficult to achieve in such environments.…”
Section: Segmentationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Actually, in the LSMS-segmentation algorithm, the scale factor can be only managed through the adopted values of the range radius and minimum region size parameters. As reported by scholars [56][57][58][59], even today, the visual interpretation of segmentation remains the recommended method to assess the quality of the obtained results.…”
Section: Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vegetation surveys using UAVs mainly obtain high resolution images and analyze the unique spectral information of plants to classify plant species or identify the distribution of habitats [7,13,16,[21][22][23][24]. For such an analysis, a vegetation index (VI) is usually applied, which is derived from the characteristics of various spectral wavelengths [25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photogrammetry is a technology that analyzes overlap between RGB photos by examining features common in multiple images from different look angles and generates a three-dimensional point cloud which can be used to create Digital Terrain Models (DTMs), Digital Surface Models (DSMs), and calculate plant height and structure by subtracting the DTM from the DSM (also known as DEM of Difference) [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Results are similar to data acquired by LiDAR [9][10][11][12][13], but come with advantages and disadvantages: data can be acquired with a standard RGB camera instead of a usually more expensive sensor [10,14], while the inability of the RGB camera to penetrate dense canopies can inhibit the construction of an accurate DTM [1,12], thus potentially introducing error into the dataset. Improvements in photogrammetric algorithms have subsequently improved the accuracy of DSMs created from aerial imagery in biometric applications, including forestry and range management, and improvements in computer processing power has made it possible to construct 3D models of progressively larger datasets [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%