2013
DOI: 10.1002/jgm.2696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

U6 promoter‐enhanced GlnUAG suppressor tRNA has higher suppression efficacy and can be stably expressed in 293 cells

Abstract: Because most tRNAs have cell-specific differential expression, this technique will enable the expression of different kinds of suppressor tRNAs in various cell types at high, functionally relevant levels. The techniques developed in the present study may contribute to the further development of suppressor tRNA-mediated gene therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This possibility is consistent with the viability of transgenic Drosophila and C. elegans organisms that over-express amber suppressor tRNA (Bianco, Townsley et al 2012, Chin 2014. Further, it has been shown that cell lines with stable expression of suppressor orthogonal tRNAs are viable (Koukuntla, Ramsey et al 2013). There are numerous examples of the use of codon-edited or suppressor tRNAs that when overexpressed in target cells or host-organisms result in biological activity that is not paired with toxicity, suggesting low suppression efficacy at bona fide termination codons, or that such events have limited cellular impact.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This possibility is consistent with the viability of transgenic Drosophila and C. elegans organisms that over-express amber suppressor tRNA (Bianco, Townsley et al 2012, Chin 2014. Further, it has been shown that cell lines with stable expression of suppressor orthogonal tRNAs are viable (Koukuntla, Ramsey et al 2013). There are numerous examples of the use of codon-edited or suppressor tRNAs that when overexpressed in target cells or host-organisms result in biological activity that is not paired with toxicity, suggesting low suppression efficacy at bona fide termination codons, or that such events have limited cellular impact.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The fact is that the strength and functionality of tRNA promoters cannot be easily predicted bioinformatically. To overcome this problem, we took advantage of the fact that the endogenous U6 promoter was successfully used for in vivo expression of a suppressor tRNA in the past ( 56 ). Therefore, we designed our own U6 promoter with its natural PSE (proximal sequence element), TATA box and +1 position for production of all tRNAs of our interest.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally, our newly developed tRNA overexpression system had to be validated for its functionality. Therefore, to demonstrate that an ectopically expressed tRNA is fully engaged with the process of translation, we exploited a specific form of human glutamine tRNA where the CUG* anticodon is mutated to CUA ( 56 ). This single point mutation renders this tRNA fully cognate for the UAG stop codon (Figure 2B , left column) and, therefore, it is expected to very efficiently suppress translation termination in vivo .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ad 1) The U6 promoter seems most suitable. [12][13][14][15] Effective tRNA charging and recruitment are determined by aminoacyl tRNA synthetases (aaRS) and elongation factor eEF1α, which recognize specific tRNA identity elements but not always the stop codon, therefore special care must be taken to fine-tune the prospective therapeutic tRNAs. 16,17 Ad 2) Two recent studies have successfully pioneered a delivery route via a recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV).…”
Section: Could Specifically Modified Read-through-inducing Trnas Help?mentioning
confidence: 99%