1997
DOI: 10.1006/jasc.1996.0137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

U-Series and ESR Dating of Teeth from Acheulian and Mousterian Levels at La Micoque (Dordogne, France)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combined U-series and ESR data permit us to determine, for each dental tissue, a U-uptake parameter p (Grü n et al, 1988). This parameter describes more accurately the geochemical history of the tooth (Grü n and McDermott, 1994;Falguè res et al, 1997). However, this procedure does not apply to situations for which uranium has been leached.…”
Section: Samples and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The combined U-series and ESR data permit us to determine, for each dental tissue, a U-uptake parameter p (Grü n et al, 1988). This parameter describes more accurately the geochemical history of the tooth (Grü n and McDermott, 1994;Falguè res et al, 1997). However, this procedure does not apply to situations for which uranium has been leached.…”
Section: Samples and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Different models of U-incorporation kinetics, such as early uptake and linear uptake (10,37), were first proposed to calculate ESR ages. The ESR-US approach taking into account both ESR and US data (radioelement contents, isotopic ratios, paleodoses, external γ-dose rate) allows a better description of uranium incorporation into the different dental tissues, as well as the determination of a single age for each sample, through the calculation of an uptake parameter p for each tissue (38). The application of this combined approach to materials from archeological and paleontological contexts now allows us to obtain reliable geochronological data for the entire Middle Pleistocene (21,39).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Rosendahl 2011: 133). Unfortunately, the destroyed upper levels at La Micoque still remain undated (Falguères et al 1997;Rosendahl 2004 Depaepe (2014) separates the Central and Eastern European "Micoquian" into two groups. A first phase (Keilmessergruppen) between 60 and 40 ka BP and a subsequent second phase (Blattspitzengruppen).…”
Section: Multiple Definitions Of the Term "Micoquian"mentioning
confidence: 99%