2006
DOI: 10.1080/02722010609481393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

U.S. Newspaper Coverage of the Canadian Health System—A Case of Seriously Mistaken Identity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…U.S. newspaper reports of public debates and policy decisions concerning the health system in Canada are, in all likelihood, selective. In the end, the conclusions drawn are not always fair or evidenced-based (Rosenau 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…U.S. newspaper reports of public debates and policy decisions concerning the health system in Canada are, in all likelihood, selective. In the end, the conclusions drawn are not always fair or evidenced-based (Rosenau 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Academic and popular literature is often characterized by opinion, folklore, misinformation, and stereotypes (Rosenau 2006). Some scholars posit that the differences between Canada and the U.S. are large and that the two countries are as unlike as “Fire and Ice” (Adams 2003), although such research often lacks analytical rigor, relies extensively on quotes from Updike or De Tocqueville, and focuses on a narrow set of opinions or consumption patterns (Smith 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%