2022
DOI: 10.5089/9798400219948.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

U.S. Monetary Policy Shock Spillovers: Evidence from Firm-Level Data

Abstract: IMF Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to encourage debate. The views expressed in IMF Working Papers are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, exploring the role of aggregate financial conditions, the findings show that firms with an initially larger expansion in leverage experience even larger declines in employment growth in the medium-term if financial conditions tighten, further pointing to a financial channel. These findings are in line with the recent firm-level empirical literature which adopts leverage as a proxy for financial vulnerabilities and finds that leverage buildups elevate financial fragility, making firms more prone to various shocks (Cai and Zhang 2011, Giroud and Mueller 2017, Ahn et al 2020, Arbatli-Saxegaard et al 2022, Kalemli-Ozcan et al 2022). 4 The empirical specifications adopt 3-year "sliding windows" to make the results comparable with Mian et al (2017) and Giroud and Mueller (2021).…”
Section: International Monetary Fundsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Lastly, exploring the role of aggregate financial conditions, the findings show that firms with an initially larger expansion in leverage experience even larger declines in employment growth in the medium-term if financial conditions tighten, further pointing to a financial channel. These findings are in line with the recent firm-level empirical literature which adopts leverage as a proxy for financial vulnerabilities and finds that leverage buildups elevate financial fragility, making firms more prone to various shocks (Cai and Zhang 2011, Giroud and Mueller 2017, Ahn et al 2020, Arbatli-Saxegaard et al 2022, Kalemli-Ozcan et al 2022). 4 The empirical specifications adopt 3-year "sliding windows" to make the results comparable with Mian et al (2017) and Giroud and Mueller (2021).…”
Section: International Monetary Fundsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The second key finding is that the response for exporters appears if anything larger than for nonexporters, which is the opposite of the findings when we consider a shock to Australian monetary policy. This is observed for both SMEs and large firms (Table B6) and is consistent with other work focusing on the response of firm-level investment and sales in foreign countries following US policy shocks (Arbatli-Saxegaard et al 2022). While the differences are not statistically significant, the greater sensitivity of exporters to foreign shocks, and of non-exporters to domestic shocks, provides further evidence of the importance of the demand channel.…”
Section: Demand Channelsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For country i and year y, I compute the share of outbound FDI position to countries included in these two regions relative to the total outbound FDI made by country i. I exclude non-EU tax haven countries from this analysis. 2 Then I compute the average of such share for the period between 2009 and 2020. Figure A.4 shows the average share per country in the sample.…”
Section: National Mnes Operating Abroadmentioning
confidence: 99%