2014
DOI: 10.3133/sir20145035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

U.S. Geological Survey Karst Interest Group Proceedings, Carlsbad, New Mexico, April 29-May 2, 2014

Abstract: Weary of the USGS. The karst hydrology field trip on Thursday will be led by Lewis Land (NCKRI karst hydrologist) and the optional Friday field trip on the geology of Carlsbad Caverns National Park will be led by George Veni. The keynote speaker is Dr.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the SPCE (approaches 1 and 3) and HM (approach 2) simulated observed average spring discharge at Wakulla and Spring Creek Springs within the calibration criterion of 10 percent, and head residuals were within the calibration criterion of plus or minus 5 ft (Davis and others, 2010;Gallegos, 2011;Gallegos and others, 2013). Thus, for average spring discharge and tracer-test time of travel, the three modeling approaches produce similar results, and all are considered acceptable calibrations (Davis and others, 2010;Kuniansky and others, 2011;Gallegos and others, 2013;Kuniansky, 2014). For the HM (approach 2), however, simulated water levels were lower than observed levels, resulting in biased residuals (Gallegos, 2011;Gallegos and others 2013).…”
Section: Model Application In the Woodville Karst Plain Florida-compmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Both the SPCE (approaches 1 and 3) and HM (approach 2) simulated observed average spring discharge at Wakulla and Spring Creek Springs within the calibration criterion of 10 percent, and head residuals were within the calibration criterion of plus or minus 5 ft (Davis and others, 2010;Gallegos, 2011;Gallegos and others, 2013). Thus, for average spring discharge and tracer-test time of travel, the three modeling approaches produce similar results, and all are considered acceptable calibrations (Davis and others, 2010;Kuniansky and others, 2011;Gallegos and others, 2013;Kuniansky, 2014). For the HM (approach 2), however, simulated water levels were lower than observed levels, resulting in biased residuals (Gallegos, 2011;Gallegos and others 2013).…”
Section: Model Application In the Woodville Karst Plain Florida-compmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The SCPE approach has been successfully applied for waterresources investigations where the models can be calibrated to flow and head (water level) information and regional-or subregional-scale water budgets are sought (Bush and Johnston, 1988;Geraghty and Miller, Inc., 1991;Davis, 1996;Williams, 1997Williams, , 2006McGurk, 1998;Teutsch and Sauter, 1998;HydroGeoLogic, Inc., 2000;Svensson, 2001;Knowles and others, 2002;McGurk and Presley, 2002;Sepúlveda, 2002;Agyei and others, 2005;Davis and Katz, 2007;Grubbs and Crandall, 2007;Davis and others, 2010;Sepúlveda and others, 2012). In general, the SCPE approach can simulate transient springflow for monthly or annual averages, but may not reproduce detailed storm-event hydrographs as well as other model types because of the onset of non-laminar flow during storms (Hill and others, 2010;Kuniansky and others, 2011;Gallegos and others, 2013;Saller and others, 2013;Kuniansky, 2014). Simulations of advective transport using a single-continuum model are infrequently performed with varying degrees of success.…”
Section: Single-continuum Porous-equivalent Modelsthe Spongementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations