1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0320(19971015)30:5<236::aid-cyto4>3.0.co;2-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

U.S.-Canadian consensus recommendations on the immunophenotypic analysis of hematologic neoplasia by flow cytometry: Data analysis and interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
65
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Antibody positivity was determined by comparison of the shape of either histograms or dot plots to those of control nonreactive antibodies. 19 Initially, each antibody was categorized simply as positive or negative based on whether the histogram showed a significant shift (usually a minimum of 80-100 channels on a 4 decade log scale) relative to nonreactive antibodies, or if a distinct subset of the gated blasts, generally amounting to at least 10% of cells, showed expression that was clearly above the threshold determined by consideration of the reactivity of the control antibody. In subsequent analyses, these two patterns were distinguished, and cases in which only a subset of cells were seen to be positive was referred to as having 'partial' positivity.…”
Section: Immunophenotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibody positivity was determined by comparison of the shape of either histograms or dot plots to those of control nonreactive antibodies. 19 Initially, each antibody was categorized simply as positive or negative based on whether the histogram showed a significant shift (usually a minimum of 80-100 channels on a 4 decade log scale) relative to nonreactive antibodies, or if a distinct subset of the gated blasts, generally amounting to at least 10% of cells, showed expression that was clearly above the threshold determined by consideration of the reactivity of the control antibody. In subsequent analyses, these two patterns were distinguished, and cases in which only a subset of cells were seen to be positive was referred to as having 'partial' positivity.…”
Section: Immunophenotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We provide recommendations for the use of controls to identify background fluorescence in clinical flow cytometry such as unstained cells, cells that do not express the antigen of interest in an antibody-labeled sample, as well as fluorescence-(or full)-minus-one (FMO), isotype and isoclonic controls. In addition to previously published guidelines (6)(7)(8)(9), this document is intended to contribute to formulation of consensus regarding the utility of flow cytometry for analysis of clinical samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] In a clinical setting, the main purpose of flow cytometric analysis is to identify abnormal cells by defining their immunophenotypic characteristics. To accomplish this task, multiparameter analysis represents a reliable approach that integrates the information provided by forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC) with multiple fluorescence parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 This strategy is also successfully applied for the analysis of many lymphoid malignancies detected in blood, bone marrow, and lymph nodes. 1,9 Specific immunophenotypic profiles have been established for several lymphoid neoplasms. [1][2][3][4] The abnormal profiles are compared to the pattern of cell marker expression normally seen in the organ/tissue being examined, and a diagnostic interpretation is made.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation