2002
DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0131:upzdas>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

U-Pb zircon dating and Sr isotope systematics of the Vindhyan Supergroup, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
104
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower Vindhyan Semri Group has largely been studied in the Son Valley region where multiple interbedded volcanic tuffs offer robust U-Pb zircon depositional age constraints of ca. 1.6 Ga (Rasmussen et al, 2002;Ray et al, 2002;Bengtson et al, 2009). These ages are broadly consistent with the occurrence of microfossils such as Grypania (Kumar, 1995) which occur globally in strata of similar ages (Adams et al, 2017).…”
Section: Age Of the Chitrakoot Taxamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower Vindhyan Semri Group has largely been studied in the Son Valley region where multiple interbedded volcanic tuffs offer robust U-Pb zircon depositional age constraints of ca. 1.6 Ga (Rasmussen et al, 2002;Ray et al, 2002;Bengtson et al, 2009). These ages are broadly consistent with the occurrence of microfossils such as Grypania (Kumar, 1995) which occur globally in strata of similar ages (Adams et al, 2017).…”
Section: Age Of the Chitrakoot Taxamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…' The next two older macrofossils have been purported to preserve the trails of motile, multicellular organisms and are more contentious than the younger taxa outlined above. The first, in the Chorhat sandstone of the lowermost Vindhyan basin in India (Seilacher et al 1998) attains Palaeoproterozoic antiquity on the merits of two concurrent and independent high-precision U -Pb studies (Rasmussen et al 2002b;Ray et al 2002). However, Seilacher (2007) has subsequently introduced a viable alternative hypothesis that the Chorhat traces could represent (biogenic?)…”
Section: The Evolving Palaeoclimate and Biospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kajrahat Limestone gradationally passes upward to the Porcellanite Formation which is volcaniclastic in nature (Roy and Banerjee, 2002). Rasmussen et al (2002) and Ray et al (2002) determined the age of the Porcellanite Formation to be 1630 Ma by the U/Pb SHRIMP dating technique. Recently, Sarangi et al (2004) obtained an age of 1600 Ma for the Rohtas Limestone (topmost formation of the Semri Group) in the Semri Group.…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%