“…However, sparse preservation of pre-Himalayan metamorphic event(s) implies that metamorphic conditions can only be used to constrain tectonic models for the Himalayan orogeny if they are tied to geochronological constraints (e.g., DeCelles, Gehrels, Quade, LaReau, & Spurlin, 2000;Gehrels et al, 2003;Marquer, Chawla, & Challandes, 2000). In the hinterland of the mountain belt, evidence for pre-Himalayan metamorphism includes Cambro-Ordovician monazite and allanite inclusions in garnet (e.g., Catlos, Sorensen, & Harrison, 2000;Catlos et al, 2002;Kohn, Wieland, Parkinson, & Upreti, 2004), Cambro-Ordovician monazite in the matrix of kyanite and sillimanite schists (Palin et al, 2018), Ordovician monazite in leucosome, interpreted as inherited from the host schist (Godin et al, 2001), early Cambrian garnet porphyroblasts (Argles, Prince, Foster, & Vance, 1999), and foliated and folded greenschist to upper amphibolite facies metamorphic rocks intruded by late Cambrian granite bodies (e.g., Manickavasagam et al, 1999;Marquer et al, 2000). However, pre-Himalayan metamorphism has been strongly overprinted by Cenozoic metamorphism in most cases, such that the metamorphic conditions recorded in the rocks are generally representative of the state of the middle crust during the Himalayan orogeny.…”