2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-821x(03)00605-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“U–Pb calcite age of the Late Permian Castile Formation, Delaware Basin: a constraint on the age of the Permian–Triassic boundary(?)”: Reply to a comment by Ian Metcalfe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Late Permian Castile Formation contains submillimeter‐scale brown calcite layers that are intercalated with gypsum (or anhydrite in the subsurface). It is assumed that the carbonate was originally aragonite on the basis of the elevated salinity of the parent fluids [ Becker et al , 2004]. Sr isotopic compositions from the Castile are quite uniform and record the Late Permian low values [ Denison et al , 1994; Kirkland et al , 2000].…”
Section: Results Of U‐pb Dating Of Carbonatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Late Permian Castile Formation contains submillimeter‐scale brown calcite layers that are intercalated with gypsum (or anhydrite in the subsurface). It is assumed that the carbonate was originally aragonite on the basis of the elevated salinity of the parent fluids [ Becker et al , 2004]. Sr isotopic compositions from the Castile are quite uniform and record the Late Permian low values [ Denison et al , 1994; Kirkland et al , 2000].…”
Section: Results Of U‐pb Dating Of Carbonatesmentioning
confidence: 99%