2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2013.11.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tyrosinase immobilized enzyme reactor: Development and evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…D, the slope of the linear fitting equation gradually increased with the increasing concentration of kojic acid, but the intercept of the ordinate almost did not change. It could be inferred that kojic acid was a competitive inhibitor for tyrosinase, which was in agreement with the reported literatures .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…D, the slope of the linear fitting equation gradually increased with the increasing concentration of kojic acid, but the intercept of the ordinate almost did not change. It could be inferred that kojic acid was a competitive inhibitor for tyrosinase, which was in agreement with the reported literatures .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It is mainly due to the steric hindrance of some active sites caused by the support, which is barely avoided after the enzyme immobilization. 45 From Table S1, † the RI-PMRs also exhibit a lower V max than the free RuBisCO. The reduction of activity is ascribed to the irreversible conformational changes of RuBisCO after immobilization.…”
Section: Kinetic Study Of Ri-pmrsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Compared with the kinetic parameters of free RuBisCO, the K m value (the Michaelis–Menten constant) for the RIMRs is relatively higher (0.070 vs. 0.049 mM), inferring a lower affinity of the immobilized enzyme for the reactant. This is a common and intrinsic weakness of immobilized enzymes, owing to the steric hindrance introduced by the coverage of some active site by the support 46 . In addition, the immobilized enzyme may lose the flexibility to bind the natural ligands during catalysis and the diffusion distance for the reactant to the immobilized enzyme on the microchannel sidewalls becomes relatively long (as compared to the free enzyme) 46 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a common and intrinsic weakness of immobilized enzymes, owing to the steric hindrance introduced by the coverage of some active site by the support 46 . In addition, the immobilized enzyme may lose the flexibility to bind the natural ligands during catalysis and the diffusion distance for the reactant to the immobilized enzyme on the microchannel sidewalls becomes relatively long (as compared to the free enzyme) 46 . From Table 1, the RIMRs also exhibited a lower V max (the maximal reaction rate) than that of the free RuBisCO.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%