Typologies of stress appraisal and problem-focused coping: associations with compliance with public health recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract

Background Given prior research finding that young adults are less likely to engage in recommended public health behaviors (PHBs) than older adults, understanding who is and is not likely to engage in PHBs among young adults is crucial to mitigating the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Drawing on the Transactional Theory of Stress and Coping, this study examined how typologies of stress appraisal (SA) and problem-focused coping (PFC) among young adults were associated with compliance with public health recommendations during the pandemic. Methods An online sample of young adults in the United States, ages 18–35, was recruited during the early phase of the pandemic (April–May 2020). Participants reported their appraisals of how central, threatening, and uncontrollable the pandemic was, their tendencies to engage in instrumental, problem-focused coping strategies, and how frequently they engaged in three recommended PHBs (social distancing, mask wearing, and hand washing). Results Using latent class analysis, we identified three classes of individuals: Low-SA/Low-PFC, Low-SA/High-PFC, and High-SA/High-PFC. Demographics did not efficiently distinguish membership in the three classes. The former two classes reported less compliance with public health recommendations than did the latter class. Tests of measurement invariance for gender indicated trivial differences in the composition of class membership and relations to compliance. Conclusions This research uncovered three qualitatively distinct classes of people who differed in their appraisal of the pandemic and their tendency to engage in PFC. Individuals who view the pandemic as central and threatening and engage in problem-focused coping were more likely than their peers to comply with guidelines recommending social distancing, mask wearing, and hand washing. These results contribute to our understanding of why people do and do not comply with public health guidelines and highlight the importance of attending to psychological variables in public health research. Understanding what drives poor compliance with public health recommendations can contribute to efforts promoting better compliance, and ultimately better health outcomes.

Identification of factors associated with non-adherence to recommended COVID-19 preventive behaviours: a cross-sectional study based on a survey among 1004 French primary care professionals

“…In the health belief model, age can modify perceived risk and susceptibility. The role of age in the adoption of preventive behaviours has been consistently found in studies showing that young adults are less likely to adopt public health behaviours 29 30. In our study, the age difference between groups (adherence vs non-adherence) was too small (31 years vs 36 years) to implicate higher perceived frailty or vulnerability in older respondents.…”

A serial mediation model of negative life events on school adjustment of left-behind adolescents in rural china: the central role of hope and gratitude

“…Consequently, their enhanced hope may enable male participants to navigate through challenging life events more effectively, leading to improved school adjustment. For instance, a study by Landy et al [ 55 ] found that male adolescents tend to engage in problem-focused coping strategies, which can contribute to their higher levels of hope and resilience.…”

Análisis de afrontamiento, sensibilidad de procesamiento sensorial (SPS) y resiliencia en alumnado universitario, en el segundo año de la Covid-19

“…Afrontamiento centrado en el problema. En esta tipología se trata de cumplir con las pautas y normas recomendadas para hacer frente al problema, en lugar de evitarlas (Landy et al, 2022). Una investigación encontró que el afrontamiento centrado en el problema y centrado en la emoción se relacionan con una buena salud mental (Li, 2020;Li et al, 2021).…”