Typologies of Scepticism in the Philosophical Tradition of Kalām

Abstract

This article examines the role of scepticism in the Islamic philosophical tradition. It begins with a treatment of the origins and purpose of these discussions in classical kal am (c. 800-1100 CE). Then it moves on to the more mature discussions treating five forms of scepticism in the post-classical period (c.1200-1800 CE), with the aim of demonstrating how they construed scepticism, the arguments for and against it, and what purposes scepticism played in their system. Three of these types of scepticism are unrestricted, meaning that their denial of knowledge is universal. The other two types are restricted to a denial of inferential knowledge, either entirely, or in certain subjects such as metaphysics and natural philosophy. The discussion will focus on two of the most widely studied works of kal am: Saʿd al-Din al-Taft az anī's Sharḥ al-ʿAq aʾid al-Nasafiyya and Jal al al-Dīn al-Daw anī's Sharḥ al-ʿAq aʾid al-ʿAḍudiyya, including some of their supercommentaries.