2012
DOI: 10.1216/rmj-2012-42-2-567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Typically real harmonic functions

Abstract: We consider a class T O H of typically real harmonic functions on the unit disk that contains the class of normalized analytic and typically real functions. We also obtain some partial results about the region of univalence for this class.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We denote by S o Hα the subclass of S Hα consisting of u such that c −1 = 0. In [4,10,25], the typically real harmonic mappings are studied. Similar to the typically real functions of analytic functions or harmonic functions, we want to study the complex-valued kernel α−harmonic functions with real coefficients.…”
Section: Introductions and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We denote by S o Hα the subclass of S Hα consisting of u such that c −1 = 0. In [4,10,25], the typically real harmonic mappings are studied. Similar to the typically real functions of analytic functions or harmonic functions, we want to study the complex-valued kernel α−harmonic functions with real coefficients.…”
Section: Introductions and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subclass of T H for which g (0) = 0 is denoted by T 0 H . A family of typically real harmonic polynomials that has some interesting geometric properties has been discussed for example in [28] (see also [5]).…”
Section: Lemma C (Methods Of Shearing)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the assumption, we must have |a 2 | ≤5 2 and |a 2 − b 2 | < 2. Since (2a 2 )/3 has to be a half integer by(3.2), a 2 ∈ {0, 3/2, −3/2}.It follows from the inequality |a 2 − b 2 | < 2 with b 2 = 1 2 that either a 2 = 0 or a 2 = 3 2 , since a 2 = −3/2 is not possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%