2009
DOI: 10.1002/eat.20706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Typical and atypical restrictive anorexia nervosa: Weight history, body image, psychiatric symptoms, and response to outpatient treatment

Abstract: Objective: Few studies have examined the characteristics of atypical restrictive anorexia nervosa (AN) with a well-powered design. The study aims to explore this issue, with particular attention paid to psychopathology and response to outpatient treatment.Method: The sample consists of 365 participants with restrictive AN and 204 with atypical AN. Three types of atypical AN were included: subthreshold (all the criteria except weight); partial (AN without amenorrhea); and participants with AN without fear of ga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
49
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
49
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in keeping with a treatment study of young adults with AN, finding that weight restoration was not associated with improvements in body image anxiety nor body avoidance behaviors, and indeed that individuals at higher weights had greater body image anxiety (Bamford, Attoe, Mountford, Morgan, & Sly, 2014). Another study found that body dissatisfaction in young adults with full and subthreshold AN is similar regardless of weight status (Santonastaso, Bosello, Schiavone, Tenconi, Degortes, & Favaro, 2009). While similar research in adolescents with AN is sparse, weight and shape concerns appear to increase with BMI percentile in adolescent girls at large, with higher body dissatisfaction in girls starting at the 50 th BMI-for-age percentile (Calzo, Sonneville, Haines, Blood, Field, & Austin, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in keeping with a treatment study of young adults with AN, finding that weight restoration was not associated with improvements in body image anxiety nor body avoidance behaviors, and indeed that individuals at higher weights had greater body image anxiety (Bamford, Attoe, Mountford, Morgan, & Sly, 2014). Another study found that body dissatisfaction in young adults with full and subthreshold AN is similar regardless of weight status (Santonastaso, Bosello, Schiavone, Tenconi, Degortes, & Favaro, 2009). While similar research in adolescents with AN is sparse, weight and shape concerns appear to increase with BMI percentile in adolescent girls at large, with higher body dissatisfaction in girls starting at the 50 th BMI-for-age percentile (Calzo, Sonneville, Haines, Blood, Field, & Austin, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This disruption may cause restrictive eating behaviours to persist [10], as evidenced by a significant correlation between motor imagery performance levels and prognostic factor such as the EDI-2 “drive for thinness” subscale [8]. Nutritional states, body size and weight changes in AN which constitute potential sources of bias because malnutrition could lead to the impairment of sensory integration and/or changes in body size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, studies have not uniformly relaxed diagnostic criteria rendering the comparison of results across studies difficult (Dellava et al, 2009; Dingemans et al, 2006; Dominguez et al, 2007; Haas et al, 2009; Kaye et al, 2008; Kaye et al, 2000; Keel et al, 2005; Klump et al, 2001; Loeb et al, 2007; Perkins et al, 2005; Reba et al, 2005; Sanci et al, 2008; Schebendach et al, 2008; Wild et al, 2009). Second, women with subthreshold AN differ from women with threshold AN on eating disorder behaviors, psychiatric comorbidities, and some temperament and personality characteristics (Becker et al, 2009; Dalle Grave et al, 2008; Gendall et al, 2006; Santonastaso et al, 2009) and these differences might impact the results of research studies. Third, the extent to which genetic factors influence development of threshold and subthreshold AN might differ (Bulik et al, 2010) and inclusion of subthreshold cases could increase the number of phenocopies in the sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, eating disorder pathology has been reported to be lower in those not meeting criterion B (fear of weight gain at a low weight) (Becker et al, 2009; Thomas et al, 2009) and inconsistent in those not meeting criterion A (Santonastaso et al, 2009; Thomas et al, 2009) or criterion D (Dalle Grave et al, 2008; Gendall et al, 2006), compared with women with threshold AN. Table 1 highlights observed similarities and differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%