2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Types of spatter and their features and formation mechanisms in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of such particles, as shown by microscopic images, increases with the successive cycles of using the powder. Such particles can also be formed in the LPBF process as a type of spatter, in this case by collisions between metallic jet spatter and solid spatter [ 25 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of such particles, as shown by microscopic images, increases with the successive cycles of using the powder. Such particles can also be formed in the LPBF process as a type of spatter, in this case by collisions between metallic jet spatter and solid spatter [ 25 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spattered metal subsequently cool down forming particles of varying sizes depending on the duration of the condensation process. These spatter formations are not unique to Co-Cr-Mo and are widely observed in a range of materials processed using powder bed fusion as summarised by Young et al [ 91 ]. Although some spatters are observed, these are not extensive and can be seen to not obstruct the overall porous architecture being generated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These spatter formations are not unique to Co-Cr-Mo and are widely observed in a range of materials processed using powder bed fusion as summarised by Young et al . [52]. Although some spatters are observed, these are not extensive and can be seen to not obstruct the overall porous architecture being generated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting track thickness and pore dimensions were characterised using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). EVO 50 SEM produced by Zeiss that uses an incident electron beam to interact with the printed sample to generate backscattered and secondary electrons to create an image of the porous sample is used [48][49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Laser Powder Bed Fusion (Lpbf)mentioning
confidence: 99%