2011
DOI: 10.1002/fut.20518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Types of liquidity and limits to arbitrage—the case of credit default swaps

Abstract: we show that funding liquidity (shadow cost of capital for arbitrageurs) as well as asset-specific liquidity (determinants of margin requirements) explain recent deviations in the arbitrage-based parity relationship between the CDS prices and bond yield spreads (CDS-Bond spread basis). Collectively, our analysis corroborates the theory on the determinants of the basis, and suggests that it is important to distinguish between these types of liquidity in determining the circumstances in which relative prices wil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inventory effects result from dealers quoting higher yields (lower prices) after having sold off a large position, at which point they are exposed to price risks from an unbalanced can be explained in particular by bond-specific liquidity. For example, Bhanot and Guo (2012) show that in the 2008-09 financial crisis, negative deviations of the CDS-bond basis are explained primarily by funding liquidity and asset-specific market liquidity. DePooter, Martin, and Pruitt (2013) show that the CDS-bond basis corresponds closely to the measure of liquidity premia they derive from a search-based asset pricing model.…”
Section: Transitory Dynamics and Long-run Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Inventory effects result from dealers quoting higher yields (lower prices) after having sold off a large position, at which point they are exposed to price risks from an unbalanced can be explained in particular by bond-specific liquidity. For example, Bhanot and Guo (2012) show that in the 2008-09 financial crisis, negative deviations of the CDS-bond basis are explained primarily by funding liquidity and asset-specific market liquidity. DePooter, Martin, and Pruitt (2013) show that the CDS-bond basis corresponds closely to the measure of liquidity premia they derive from a search-based asset pricing model.…”
Section: Transitory Dynamics and Long-run Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…VIX arises as a measure of event risk (Pan and Singleton, 2008). Through VIX index, one can deduce the investors' sentiments and risk appetites such that as stated by Bhanot and Guo (2012) it can be taken as a proxy for capital availability of hedge fund investors.  vstoxx: The monthly change in the Euro Stoxx 50 Volatility Index (VSTOXX) is used as another indicator of volatility risk premium.…”
Section: Figure 1 5-year Cds Yields and Credit Rating Announcementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying their model to the CDS-bond basis, they conclude that deviations from equilibrium are caused by a difference in margin requirements of funded assets (such as corporate bonds) with respect to their unfunded derivatives (CDS). Bhanot and Guo (2012) examine the role of liquidity as a potential factor of basis deviation from parity.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%