2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Types of Intermaxillary Fixation and Their Interaction With Palatine Fracture Reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contemporaneous management of mandibular fracture involves maxillomandibular fixation (MMF). This commonly involves using wires and metal fixatures to localise the fractures following the application of surgical fixatures (e.g., arch bars and Leonard Buttons) [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ], followed by intra-oral surgical access in the buccal sulcus and application of load-sharing osteosynthesis according to Champy principles. It is postulated that the dependent position of the surgical incision in the buccal sulcus makes the site vulnerable to biofilm-producing bacteria, and strategies to reduce this load may prove beneficial to fracture management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporaneous management of mandibular fracture involves maxillomandibular fixation (MMF). This commonly involves using wires and metal fixatures to localise the fractures following the application of surgical fixatures (e.g., arch bars and Leonard Buttons) [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ], followed by intra-oral surgical access in the buccal sulcus and application of load-sharing osteosynthesis according to Champy principles. It is postulated that the dependent position of the surgical incision in the buccal sulcus makes the site vulnerable to biofilm-producing bacteria, and strategies to reduce this load may prove beneficial to fracture management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%