2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-22038-9_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TypeMiner: Recovering Types in Binary Programs Using Machine Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…93% of all data objects are correctly classified as pointer or arithmetic types by TypeMiner [27]. This work is roughly similar to our D-type recognition.…”
Section: E String Recognitionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…93% of all data objects are correctly classified as pointer or arithmetic types by TypeMiner [27]. This work is roughly similar to our D-type recognition.…”
Section: E String Recognitionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…We pay more attention to types represented by pointers and strings, while related research has different goals for type recognition. Only TypeMiner [27] has similarities with our research, but not identical.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 47%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The exploration is improved if the type information is available. Therefore, the proposed method may more precisely explore by applying research of reverse-engineering type information such as TIE [19] or those of type prediction such as Debin [12] and TypeMiner [21]. Section 3.5, tap point detection uses matching between the values in a test script and thouse in script engines.…”
Section: Tap Point Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%