2019
DOI: 10.1101/753335
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type-specific dendritic integration in mouse retinal ganglion cells

Abstract: ABSTRACTNeural computation relies on the integration of synaptic inputs across a neuron’s dendritic arbour. However, the fundamental rules that govern dendritic integration are far from understood. In particular, it is still unclear how cell type-specific differences in dendritic integration arise from general features of neural morphology and membrane properties. Here, retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), which relay the visual system’s first computations to the brain, represent an … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the high density and overlap of dendritic processes across the IPL means that it is impossible to tell if groups of dendritic ROIs belong to the same RGC (Figures 1D and 1E). Nevertheless, functional dendritic data is indicative of the local computations that occur within RGC dendrites as they integrate signals from BCs and ACs in different layers of the IPL and in different positions of the eye [79]. Further, our single cell data (Figures S2A-S2E) suggests that dendritic signals in population recordings are probably also a reasonable proxy for somatic signals, with the added benefit that their signal-to-noise was generally higher (e.g., Figure 2A).…”
Section: A Note On Roi Segmentation and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the high density and overlap of dendritic processes across the IPL means that it is impossible to tell if groups of dendritic ROIs belong to the same RGC (Figures 1D and 1E). Nevertheless, functional dendritic data is indicative of the local computations that occur within RGC dendrites as they integrate signals from BCs and ACs in different layers of the IPL and in different positions of the eye [79]. Further, our single cell data (Figures S2A-S2E) suggests that dendritic signals in population recordings are probably also a reasonable proxy for somatic signals, with the added benefit that their signal-to-noise was generally higher (e.g., Figure 2A).…”
Section: A Note On Roi Segmentation and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2E,F, Supplementary Video S1). Together, this allowed sampling both RGC dendrites, which integrate inputs from BCs and ACs (IPL) Masland, 2012;Ran et al, 2019), as well as from RGC somata, whose activity is expected to largely reflect the spiking activity for transmission to the brain (GCL) (Baden et al, 2016). Throughout, we present data recorded from these distinct structures together, with dendrites plotted on top and somata plotted on an inverted y-axis below (e.g.…”
Section: Highly Diverse Light-driven Responses Of Rgcs In the Live Eyementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ease of using these algorithms relying on the spike-triggered ensemble under white noise stimulation is also the disadvantage of these approaches -they can only be applied to spike data under white noise stimulation. In many cases, experiments today record more diverse measurements from neurons, such as two-photon calcium imaging [23,24] or synaptic current recording [25] under more diverse types of stimulation, such as correlated noise and natural stimuli [26]. In those cases, spike-triggered analysis can not be used directly without modification, as the spike-triggered average is no longer the maximum likelihood estimate [3].…”
Section: Other Approaches To Efficient Estimation Of Receptive Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%