The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4700.2.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type species designation for Archaebranchinecta Rogers & Coronel (Branchiopoda: Anostraca)

Abstract: Over the course of my career I have described nine Branchiopod genera and one subgenus, either alone or with other researchers. From these, four genera and the subgenus belong to Anostraca. But I was remiss in designating type species for one of those taxa which caused the name to become unavailable. This short communication is to rectify this unfortunate error on my part.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, nucleosomes bend DNA, and preferentially bind to DNA sequences where particular dinucleotides are located at specific positions relative to the direction of the DNA bending (Reviewed in 10 ). Some transcription factors can also affect the conformation of the DNA backbone [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] , and their specificity towards dinucleotides could similarly be explained by the contribution of the dinucleotides to the structure and flexibility of the DNA backbone. However, the structural distortion caused by histone octamer or DNA-bending TFs is expected to result in relatively weak dinucleotide preferences, and thus cannot account for highly specific recognition of dinucleotides observed for TFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, nucleosomes bend DNA, and preferentially bind to DNA sequences where particular dinucleotides are located at specific positions relative to the direction of the DNA bending (Reviewed in 10 ). Some transcription factors can also affect the conformation of the DNA backbone [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] , and their specificity towards dinucleotides could similarly be explained by the contribution of the dinucleotides to the structure and flexibility of the DNA backbone. However, the structural distortion caused by histone octamer or DNA-bending TFs is expected to result in relatively weak dinucleotide preferences, and thus cannot account for highly specific recognition of dinucleotides observed for TFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%