2019
DOI: 10.1002/2050-7038.12071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type recognition of single‐phase‐to‐ground faults in nonsolidly earthed distribution networks‐architecture and method

Abstract: Summary Single‐phase‐to‐ground faults (SFs) could be characterized by multiple aspects, like time domain and frequency domain. There is no unified classification standard for such faults. Previous studies usually focused on detection and feeder‐selection techniques for SFs. This paper presents the classification architecture and recognition method for SF in nonsolidly earthed distribution networks. On the basis of the waveform data recorded by remote fault indicators and other recording devices, steady and tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the four-circuit series- compensated transmission lines, Saber [ 13 ] proposed a framework based on the theory of the transmission lines and Taylor series expansion of distributed parameters. In a non-solidly earthed distribution network, classification and recognition architecture was suggested by Liang et al [ 14 ] for Single-phase-to-ground faults (SFs). The study was carried out and tested through field data and artificial test data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the four-circuit series- compensated transmission lines, Saber [ 13 ] proposed a framework based on the theory of the transmission lines and Taylor series expansion of distributed parameters. In a non-solidly earthed distribution network, classification and recognition architecture was suggested by Liang et al [ 14 ] for Single-phase-to-ground faults (SFs). The study was carried out and tested through field data and artificial test data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%